MolaKule
Staff member
In post 53, are you seeing the fluid specification or the oil properties?OH AND BY THE WAY IDEMITSU IS WHO SUPPLYS MOST ALL ASIAN AUTO MAKERS THEIR TRANSMISSION FLUIDS.
In post 53, are you seeing the fluid specification or the oil properties?OH AND BY THE WAY IDEMITSU IS WHO SUPPLYS MOST ALL ASIAN AUTO MAKERS THEIR TRANSMISSION FLUIDS.
Huh ?And does that show the proper Idemitsu supplied to dealer or manufacture fluid, as it would be the same designation as what is on the bottle you'd buy at the dealer?
I think at this point reason has been lost.Huh ?
Actually I now realize the local trans shop is leery of flushing an old trans, but not afraid to just drain the pan an refill.Chris Fix Youtube how to DIY video and many others recently. Also I read this on DIY websites years ago. It's classic knowledge that still applies. My local trans shop also recently told me this (in regard to my Buick in that case) and they're pros. Also many on BITOG (including this thread) are leery of changing ATF in a neglected transnission.
You are so correct !I think at this point reason has been lost.
1) Dealers (even Honda) don't always use the "right" fluid and will often use fluid that's said to be compatible by the fluid manufacturer. That dealer may be using Idemitsu's ATF that they claim compatibility with DW-1.the Idemistu barrel at a Honda dealer with the proper designation for the particular fluid
In post 53, are you seeing the fluid specification or the oil properties?And does that show the proper Idemitsu supplied to dealer or manufacture fluid, as it would be the same designation as what is on the bottle you'd buy at the dealer?
It has to be. No way a company like Valvoline would risk claiming their ATF is compatible if it weren't. Honda supposedly formulated DW-1 to make shifts firmer. When I test drive a car, I always find an open road and mash the throttle from a stop specifically to FEEL how it shifts. If it shifts butter-smooth, that's fine and if it shifts with firm, but quick shifts, that's fine too. It's when it SLAMs into each gear or slips that you uncover that you know to walk (IMO).My question is, is MaxLife OK for cars like early Hondas and Toyotas?
Yes post 53, shows no Idemitsu DW-1 it shows H. All apples to oranges on the chart.In post 53, are you seeing the fluid specification or the oil properties?
Did you read the educational references in post #54?
In post 53, are you seeing the fluid specification or the oil properties?
It has to be. No way a company like Valvoline would risk claiming their ATF is compatible if it weren't. Honda supposedly formulated DW-1 to make shifts firmer. When I test drive a car, I always find an open road and mash the throttle from a stop specifically to FEEL how it shifts. If it shifts butter-smooth, that's fine and if it shifts with firm, but quick shifts, that's fine too. It's when it SLAMs into each gear or slips that you uncover that you know to walk (IMO).
Fluid makers do have products that are NOT compatible with certain OEM fluids and they either don't list them or they sell an entirely separate product. Isn't there a Chrysler fluid (ATF+4 ??) that's an oddball ? I'm not sure if Valvoline and others offer a substitute for Honda 10 or 11-speed transmissions either, do they ?
I never suggested that "compatible" = "matches exactly".but this does NOT mean Maxlife matches the OEM fluid exactly
Idemitsu doesn't sell an ATF called "DW-1". You claim to have seen a barrel of it though....shows no Idemitsu DW-1 it shows H. All apples to oranges on the chart.
People bought those fluids and sent them to a lab to have the composition analyzed.Please explain who developed the chart? Did that come from Idemitsu?
I would like to hear their explanation, of those differences and what it means for sure.
Post itLets be honest, has anyone here seen the photo that I posted reference to? Yes or No?