OVERKILL
$100 Site Donor 2021
Ford advertises EPA figures, just like everyone else, which, as we know from gas vehicles, can be close, or not so close, because it's based on a specific drive cycle.Your argument would be valid, (that this guy is a "moron"), if Ford advertised the correct numbers, and he bought it anyway, and then started complaining. But that was not the case. The reality is he was outright lied to, and duped into purchasing something that could not perform the task it was designed, advertised, and sold to do.
"Ford estimates that range for the 2022 F-150 Lightning electric pickup will be 230 miles for trucks with the standard battery and 300 miles on trucks with the extended-range pack".
There's no lie here. The EPA cycles are not done with a fully loaded vehicle, which will have an impact on range for both electric and non-electric vehicles.
Ford advertises 320 miles as the EPA range for the 2023 Lightning Lariat. Assuming a linear relationship between indicated battery capacity and range, that means for every 1%, the truck can go 3.2 miles based on EPA cycle style driving. Assuming he took MB-75 South, he drove 224 miles and had 10% charge left, so that's a total range of 256 miles, or 2.56 miles per 1%. It would be more useful if we knew how many kWh the vehicle took to charge, but this is what we have.
Per the table I provided in this post:
https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/t...ightening-by-7-16.371337/page-12#post-6561613
70Mph (non-EPA) range as tested by InsideEV's for the Lightning with the extended range battery is 270 miles, which he was very close to.
A quick glance at that table shows that EPA vs real range is all over the map and the F-150 is not the worst offender, being close to the Tesla Model Y and doing better than the Rivian.
Speed and weight have a bigger impact on EV's, generally, than to do on gas and diesel vehicles. The buyer needs to understand this and adjust their expectations accordingly if their driving habits aren't going to mirror the EPA testing protocol.