If a consumer purchases an automotive battery today, he or she is destined to purchase a battery containing one of these setups:
- Contains vent caps, no maintenance-free claim.
- Contains vent caps, maintenance-free claim.
- Contains visual hydrometer, no vent caps, maintenance-free claim.
- Contains visual hydrometer, vent caps, no maintenance-free claim.
- Gel-type, no visual hydrometer, maintenance-free claim.
My father's 92 Toyota Previa had setup #4. There were vent caps, yet there was also an "eye" to indicate battery health. It was a three color system: green or blue for "good," red for "add distilled water," and clear for "discharged." The van was a garage queen, only used several times a year for long trips.
The battery always showed the color for a "good" condition via the visual hydrometer. Never received the RED indicator to add distilled water. So, I never did. After seven years on the original battery, the indicator finally turned RED, and the battery died at the same time. The battery was topped-up, but then the indicator indicated a discharged state. At that time, I just tossed the battery as it didn't owe us a dime anyway after seven years.
My point being, just how important is it to keep your battery topped up? Especially the low-maintenance types.
For instance, if I go out and purchase a Duralast GOLD (Johnson Controls) battery today, it makes no claim of being maintenance-free. It still contains the traditional, removal vent caps. If I left it alone and never touched it, what are the chances that I'd still be able to obtain a reasonable five years out of it?
Likewise, Johnson Controls makes batteries that are labeled maintenance-free under the Kirkland Signature, DIEHARD, etc labels. While these batteries are labeled maintenance-free, they still contain vent caps. Is it necessary to top-up these batteries?
This has me thinking. Despite being labeled "maintenance-free," won't these batteries still lose water at the same rate as the ones that aren't labeled maintenance-free? Or do they contain a different material in the electrolyte that is less prone to water evaporation?
Or should the electrolyte never require top-up anyway under normal service? After all, the battery in the Previa (as mentioned earlier) never "called" for a top-up until the very end of its life, seven years, so doesn't that mean most batteries don't lose very much water?
*So, in the end, the question is, do batteries really need to be topped up? Or under normal driving conditions, that battery top-up makes little difference in service life. *
Thanks in advance.