ls1mike
$50 Site Donor 2026
Didn't talk to anyone, but I would bet it is all original. Was the cleanest Pinto I have seen in 20 plus years.
Yes I was at Harbor Freight.
I have way more appreciation for those now than I did in the '70s.View attachment 348281
Didn't talk to anyone, but I would bet it is all original. Was the cleanest Pinto I have seen in 20 plus years.
Yes I was at Harbor Freight.![]()
![]()
Don't you blasphemy the K-Car, L-Bodies (think Omni)and G-Bodies(Daytona, Lebaron).Chrysler's rebadged Mitsubishis were much better cars, but not as interesting.
I beg to differ... My first car was a '64 Beetle, 1200 CC, 40 HP, 4 speed manual-63 MPH on flat ground (which would have got you ran over today, but it was 1980). My $25 '72 Pinto automatic with the 2.0 would have ran RINGS around that Beetle! Not to mention the '64's lack of heat, 6V electrical system, seat belts.... etc...Ford's answer to the popularity of the VW Beetle but failed
Don't you blasphemy the K-Car, L-Bodies (think Omni)and G-Bodies(Daytona, Lebaron).![]()
Some had the Mitsubishi 2.6 hemi. The early L-bodies had a VW 1.9.
The rest were all Ma MoPar unless the turbo car had a Mitsubishi turbo. The Early ones and intercooled ones had a Garrett turbo.
in 88ish non-intercooled ones had the smaller Mitsubishi turbo.
There you go. Some useless information you or no one else on the planet needs.
The K-Cars (Dodge Aries/Plymouth Reliant) were a decade later than the Pinto and Vega - I remember the teaser billboards in September 1980 - "K is coming!".Don't you blasphemy the K-Car, L-Bodies (think Omni)and G-Bodies(Daytona, Lebaron).![]()
Some had the Mitsubishi 2.6 hemi. The early L-bodies had a VW 1.9.
The rest were all Ma MoPar unless the turbo car had a Mitsubishi turbo. The Early ones and intercooled ones had a Garrett turbo.
in 88ish non-intercooled ones had the smaller Mitsubishi turbo.
There you go. Some useless information you or no one else on the planet needs.
The Gremlin wasn't a bad car but a bit weird looking. The Pinto wasn't a bad car but had a tendency to burst into flames when hit in the rear (ask me how I know). The Vega was garbage because they hadn't figured out how to properly use aluminum in engines yet when they came out with it. The Cricket and Simca were very old tech and the Mitsubishi's really were 'much better cars'.I'd love to see a Pinto, a Vega, and a Gremlin together - and perhaps some over the weird Mopar imports from that era too - the French Simca 1204, and the Brit Hillman (rebadged as a Plymouth Cricket).
Chrysler's rebadged Mitsubishis were much better cars, but not as interesting.
My brother had one he gave to my niece when she was 16 or 17. The chain broke on that one just a block uphill from my house! What a place to do that. Coasted it to the driveway and then pulled it in with the lawn tractor. I think the parts were about $115 plus new antifreeze, oil, and filter. She just took my car and I rode the Sportster for the 3 or so days it took to finish fixing it.Mitsu 2.6 with its balance shaft being used in the early "Magic Wagons" (Dodge Caravan/Plymouth Voyager). They were notorious for dropping the timing chain.
some more useless info !Don't you blasphemy the K-Car, L-Bodies (think Omni)and G-Bodies(Daytona, Lebaron).![]()
Some had the Mitsubishi 2.6 hemi. The early L-bodies had a VW 1.9.
The rest were all Ma MoPar unless the turbo car had a Mitsubishi turbo. The Early ones and intercooled ones had a Garrett turbo.
in 88ish non-intercooled ones had the smaller Mitsubishi turbo.
There you go. Some useless information you or no one else on the planet needs.
Here’s a recent Hagerty Simca article. I had a 1204 as did my sister. https://www.hagerty.com/media/opinion/against-all-oddities/against-all-oddities-simca-sickness/I have way more appreciation for those now than I did in the '70s.
I'd love to see a Pinto, a Vega, and a Gremlin together - and perhaps some over the weird Mopar imports from that era too - the French Simca 1204, and the Brit Hillman (rebadged as a Plymouth Cricket).
Chrysler's rebadged Mitsubishis were much better cars, but not as interesting.
I bought an '88 Aries 2.2L as our "first car". It was good.The K-Cars (Dodge Aries/Plymouth Reliant) were a decade later than the Pinto and Vega - I remember the teaser billboards in September 1980 - "K is coming!".
IIRC, the Omni/Horizon twins were whipped together as competitors to the VW Rabbit, appearing c. 1978. Were they based on an existing European Chrysler model? Agreed, I think they used a VW engine early on. 1.7 l?
I remember the big Mitsu 2.6 with its balance shaft being used in the early "Magic Wagons" (Dodge Caravan/Plymouth Voyager). They were notorious for dropping the timing chain. That engine was optional - the base engine was the K-Car 2.2! Later on there was a 3.0 V6. I think that may also have been a Mitsu. Not sure.