We don't need hail MarysSay three our fathers and three hail marys and use Liqui Moly..
We don't need hail MarysSay three our fathers and three hail marys and use Liqui Moly..
Just tossed in Ceratec with M1 0w30 and a hint of Hydraulic Lifter Additive after doing a ten minute idle flush using Gumout Multitune and a CRC GDi cleaning.To all my BITOG friends...er...haters.....cheers and Merry Christmas or whatever holiday you celebrate or don't celebrate. I know what I want in my stocking (and congealed in the bottom of my oil pan)!
View attachment 132145
Maybe they can make it a MLM/dealer model like Amsoil and I can sell this stuff!ah, the LQ dealer at it again
You remind ME of ME! When I find something I like, I stick to it like glue. It becomes just my latest obsession. Most of the times that turns out for the better.Maybe they can make it a MLM/dealer model like Amsoil and I can sell this stuff!
So you need to put in an extra additive to make the oil stronger lol
My noise was aimed at a person's oil brand preference nothing to do with additives. Sorry I likely stepped into the wrongSo you need to put in an extra additive to make the oil stronger lol
Happy St. Patrick's Day.
So any oil beyond bare min. is beyond your scope. Got it. Supertech makes some nice products...I use them and I suggest you do too. There is another oil using W like this product. Many higher end oils use much more Mo beyond what is likely required for average folks using average vehicles in average ways.So you need to put in an extra additive to make the oil stronger lol
Agree with all of this, plus, I don't see Mobil, Shell, or any other reputable motor oil producers advertising additives to be used in their already formulated finished oils.I just can't think of a single reason to use LM oil. The stuff is unremarkable and overpriced.
There's nothing to be a fan of. The evangelical following is the icing on the cake.
Heard this, or words similar so many times.Agree with all of this, plus, I don't see Mobil, Shell, or any other reputable motor oil producers advertising additives to be used in their already formulated finished oils.
That's what's kind of crazy to me, is these rabid fans preach about how superior LM is, but it's so good that you have to also buy and pour in their secondary additives to bolster the oil itself? Is the oil not good enough then? There's no concern about altering the balance of the oil's formulation then?
I view Liqui-Moly as being like Lucas in a suit and tie.
And for what it's worth, I've used the LM oil mud flush and their Proline flush, and these products *did* reduce oil burning in a Toyota with carboned up rings for me, so I by no means am bashing their entire portfolio or anything, but their motor oils are completely average and overpriced and the additives aren't, imo, something that should be considered a requirement for new/well running engines, but that's how people use them.
Most of LM's oils have OE approvals and so will perform like any other oil with the same approvals. Selling additives isn't the same as saying "you need to add them".but it's so good that you have to also buy and pour in their secondary additives to bolster the oil itself? Is the oil not good enough then?
This should be "want" - much like the many here are using HPL products (the new VII-free line) or the like...folks want the best possible base stocks/additive packs so are going with an oil that arguably isn't needed at all in their application over an OTS oil but they want it...cool by me...just like if you want to use a can of Ceratec etc. in your car for a real or possibly just perceived benefit...whatever makes you happy. I believe there was a Euro cert'd (TUV?) test floating around for Ceratec indicating it did what it said in that testing.Heard this, or words similar so many times.
If you need to put an additive into your motor oil, then you really need a better motor oil.