Honesty is important to me.Incorrect, no one made him lose his job
Let's be transparent and honest in these posts, some people actually believe everything they read in posts.
Mr Toyoda at age 66 stepped down as CEO and President he has been at the helm since 2009. He is now the new Chairman of the Board (he is hardly out on the street) in fact he is taking over the position of the current chairman who will still remain on the board under him. The current chairman has been considering stepping down for some time.
https://www.cnbc.com/2023/01/26/toyota-ceo-and-president-akio-toyoda-to-step-down-.html
Yeah, doesnt seem to be anything wrong with some new fresh "blood" for the changing marketplace and it is changing while still having the past successes still there. I tend to think a lot about their culture over there of honorable passing on the reins when they feel their time is up.Sato San has some serious engineering cred, if Im not mistaken he was the lead manager on the LC500 project, a dazzling jewel amongst rebadged toyota products.
Agree and Takeshi admitted struggling for quite some time. At least the way I read that article I linked which quotes his words about that.It all started with Takeshi Uchiyamada who resigned as Chairman. He is 76 and decided it was time. The reason was not given.
Toyoda will be Chairman. Koji Sato will be President and CEO.
There is no intrigue going on.
Fun fact, the RZ was developed on hollowed out current gen highlander shell. If you see the RZ launch promo with Toyoda doing a TD, its actually that prototype.The styling of it is very traditional compared to most EVs, almost like this was a platform they had planned for something else. Really looks like it could've been a fuel cell crossover to compliment the Mirai.
I think Toyoda's younger brother or cousin (i forget atm) is currently being trained as well through the ranks. I believe the tradition is for them to start at the bottom, Toyoda was a saleperson then work your way to the top.It all started with Takeshi Uchiyamada who resigned as Chairman. He is 76 and decided it was time. The reason was not given.
Toyoda will be Chairman. Koji Sato will be President and CEO.
There is no intrigue going on.
Of course, it’s a Lexus. It’s not cobbled together by people who wake up at 3-4AM from places far away from the “proper” Bay Area(Stockton/Modesto and Fairfield-Vacaville) and hauled in on buses to Tesla Fremont.Looks a lot nicer to me than anything Tesla offers. Having said that I wouldn't buy one.
https://www.torquenews.com/1083/toyota-says-it-bz4x-electric-car-may-not-charge-below-32-degrees-f
I think this guy might be correct. If Toyota is using LFP chemistry, it may explain for some of the attributes.
But Toyota is also advertising that their battery will retain 90% of its capacity after 10 years. Tesla doesn't match that.
This is something I am not familiar with. What is considered a charge cycle? If I plug my vehicle in every night, is that considered a cycle? Or is it some amount of discharge / recharge?should last around 3,000 charge cycles.
Fit and finish I'm positive is better, and I wouldn't be so quick to count Toyota out of the game. IMO in about ten years from now the current battery technology will be a joke, and Toyota will be probably be a leader in a better technology, be it battery or something else.Of course, it’s a Lexus. It’s not cobbled together by people who wake up at 3-4AM from places far away from the “proper” Bay Area(Stockton/Modesto and Fairfield-Vacaville) and hauled in on buses to Tesla Fremont.
But Tesla has won the game… for now. TNGA isn’t really built for BEV electrification. It was designed around ICE and xHEV. The old Mirai was basically an uglier Prius, with less cargo space. The new Mirai switching over to TNGA-L allowed Toyota to sacrifice less space - H2 tanks can sit in the drivetrain tunnel.
It means when you've used 100 percent of the capacity of the battery. So if you use 20 percent/day then it's 1 charge cycle every 5 days.This is something I am not familiar with. What is considered a charge cycle? If I plug my vehicle in every night, is that considered a cycle? Or is it some amount of discharge / recharge?
It's supposed to be the rating how many times you can take it from a low state of charge to full before the battery reaches only 80% of its original capacity. It's why the common practice in electric cars is to not run it below 20% and not charge over 80%-90%. It's the deep discharging and full recharging that wears the batteries over time. The LPF battery used in the base Model 3 being rated to 3,000 charges is said to be a million mile battery. I think once you calculate in real world mileage for each one of these charges you're looking more at 800,000 miles and the battery doesn't have suggestions to not charge to full regularly.This is something I am not familiar with. What is considered a charge cycle? If I plug my vehicle in every night, is that considered a cycle? Or is it some amount of discharge / recharge?
LOL I posted his early. A few grammar errors. Now corrected.Fit and finish I'm positive is better, and I wouldn't be so quick to count Toyota out of the game. IMO in about ten years from now the current battery technology will be a joke, and Toyota will most likely be a leader in a better technology, be it battery or something else.
It means when you've used 100 percent of the capacity of the battery. So if you use 20 percent/day then it's 1 charge cycle every 5 days.
In any case you shouldn't "top off" a battery.
"Elon Musk stated earlier this year that the Tesla Model 3 drive unit and body was designed to last one million miles. The battery, however, has a minimum lifespan of 1,500 charge cycles which should translate to 300,000+ miles (standard range/standard range plus) to 500,000 miles (long-range variants)."