Largest displacement now / ever

My first car, a 1983 Camaro Berlinetta with the ohh so awesome 5.0 Liter.

I think every car I've had since then has had a smaller, more powerful motor (Except for my 91 Miata).
 
Last of my Chevelles had the SB Chevy 400cui 6.6L
Owned (2) Ford 302cui 5.0 - (best engines I ever owned.)

Fastest thing I ever rode in was a buddies Mercury Cougar with the 429cui engine he had source from a Ford. I had to change pants after that ride (pinned to the seat).

What is crazy , now we have a Honda 1.5 tiny GDI-T engine that has 160mph on the dash. Many of the fuel injected cars of today , I am certain could out run a lot of the older big heavy bodied classic cars from the 60s-70s.
 
YES, after about 1972 - 1973 all the Big Three auto makers were forced by (good old/NOT) Uncle Sam, EPA and the auto insurance companies to strangle down nearly all engines they put out. It still took Chrysler/Plymouth/Dodge a few years to comply. They were still sneaking out some high horse engines for a while longer.

So all of the engines eventually turned into what was known as "Smog Era" engines. The new unleaded fuel and the things that were done to de-tune engines really smothered the horsepower to near nothing on lots of cars and trucks.

It took until some time in the late 1980s to early 1990s till the automakers started to figure how to put more horses back into what they were making. Fuel injection and computer control became the savior for auto enthusiast..... We pretty much got it all now. If one want some high horses you can find them plenty places these days.
 
1969 Cadillac DeVille 4 door hard top. 472cid. I didnt get it till 1984. My first, last and only Cadillac. Bought it from my future father in law.

Paco
 
Largest is now and ever 5.6 Liter V8 in my Nissan Armada and this engines predeccessor in my 2008 Pathfinder also 5.6 L V8.
Smallest was 2.0 liter 4 cyl in a Sabb 900
 
I drove a ‘77 Cadillac with a 7L (425 cid) for a couple of years. Only rated at 180 hp but loads of torque. It had posi and would easily leave two black stripes on the pavement.
 
My first car, a 1983 Camaro Berlinetta with the ohh so awesome 5.0 Liter.

I think every car I've had since then has had a smaller, more powerful motor (Except for my 91 Miata).
Ah, the LG4 V-8, cranking out a whopping 155 HP through its tiny valves, small cylinder head area, Q-jet electronic carb and two into one catalytic converter choked exhaust system….
 
My Uncle had a brand new Oldsmobile Delta 88 with a Rocket 455 with 210 HP but gobs of torque. In those days it was common to tow a small travel trailer with a four door sedan. I have a Polaroid picture of the engine (somewhere ).
 
Of course the topic is also about torque. Prior to changing from gross to net HP, those 454 Chevys, and 455 BOP’s we’re making 500 ft lbs, but by 1974 the net rating, with lower compression, resulted in torque ratings of around 350 ft lbs. Still, peak torque was at a low rpm like less than 2500 rpm. Comparatively my 6.0 makes 383 ft lbs but at 4500 rpm.
 
Last edited:
Of course the topic is also about torque. Prior to changing from gross to net HP, those 454 Chevys, and 455 BOP’s we’re making 500 ft lbs, but by 1974 the net rating, with lower compression, resulted in torque ratings of around 350 ft lbs. Still, peak torque was at a low rpm like less than 2500 rpm. Comparatively my 6.0 makes 383 ft lbs but at 4500 rpm.
Yeah, my 6.4L makes 475lb-ft, but it's at 4,200 RPM. The dyno charts look pretty good for them though, lots of toque down just off idle.
 
Ah, the LG4 V-8, cranking out a whopping 155 HP through its tiny valves, small cylinder head area, Q-jet electronic carb and two into one catalytic converter choked exhaust system….
IMG_1850_Original.webp

I have a great deal of experience with the 5.0 L LG4
 
Back
Top Bottom