2006 Subaru Forester 2.5 NA. Same brand and weight of oil since the first oil change. Pure One filters.
Code:
Vehicle mileage
2710 5890 11910 18045 24080 30230
Mileage on oil drain
2710 3180 6020 6135 6035 6150
Fe 42 15 8 5 10 5
Cr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ni 0 0 0 0 0 0
Al 14 6 3 2 2 1
Cu 68 38 19 5 2 2
Pb 1 0 0 0 0 0
Sn 1 0 0 0 0 0
Cd 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ag 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ti 0 0 0 0 0 0
V 0 0 0 0 0 0
Si 190 47 32 22 19 21
Na 4 1 2 2 2 4
K 1 0 0 0 0 0
Mo 1182 185 57 39 37 42
Sb 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mn 2 0 0 0 0 0
Li 0 0 0 0 0 0
B 151 191 136 117 123 140
Mg 23 6 7 6 6 8
Ca 2007 1745 1879 1849 1880 2148
Ba 10 0 0 0 0 0
P 873 565 564 571 589 700
Zn 1064 677 674 677 682 862
Fuel dilution, %
1.5 1.8 1.6 0.5 0 < .1
Soot < .1 0 0 0 0 0
Water < .1 0 0 0 0 0
Viscosity, 100 C cSt
10.1 8.8 9 8.9 8.8 9.7
Code:
Vehicle mileage
36197 41947 48040 54610 60835 67070
Mileage on oil drain
5967 5750 6093 6570 6225 6235
Fe 5 4 5 9 7 4
Cr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ni 0 0 0 0 0 0
Al 1 2 2 2 2 2
Cu 3 1 3 3 3 5
Pb 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cd 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ag 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ti 0 0 0 0 0 0
V 0 0 0 0 0 0
Si 17 16 20 14 16 21
Na 2 2 3 2 3 4
K 2 0 1 0 0 0
Mo 39 40 40 35 42 43
Sb 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Li 0 0 0 0 0 0
B 131 126 105 96 109 86
Mg 6 7 10 6 8 8
Ca 2032 2059 2048 1758 2007 2178
Ba 0 0 0 0 0 0
P 594 669 678 557 595 650
Zn 817 740 780 648 673 760
Fuel dilution, %
1.3 0.7 1.3 1.1 2.1 1.1
Soot < .1 0.1 < .1 < .1 < .1 < .1
Water 0 0 0 0 0 0
Viscosity, 100 C cSt
9.4 9 9.2 9.3 8.8 9.5
Sorry about the chart - Its an Excel spreadsheet but it doesn't transfer well.
The Fe and Cu levels dropped after breakin and everything else is excellent. Si is typical of most new engines using RTV sealants.
Conclusion: there is no reason to run less tham 6k between changes in this service.
Code:
Vehicle mileage
2710 5890 11910 18045 24080 30230
Mileage on oil drain
2710 3180 6020 6135 6035 6150
Fe 42 15 8 5 10 5
Cr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ni 0 0 0 0 0 0
Al 14 6 3 2 2 1
Cu 68 38 19 5 2 2
Pb 1 0 0 0 0 0
Sn 1 0 0 0 0 0
Cd 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ag 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ti 0 0 0 0 0 0
V 0 0 0 0 0 0
Si 190 47 32 22 19 21
Na 4 1 2 2 2 4
K 1 0 0 0 0 0
Mo 1182 185 57 39 37 42
Sb 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mn 2 0 0 0 0 0
Li 0 0 0 0 0 0
B 151 191 136 117 123 140
Mg 23 6 7 6 6 8
Ca 2007 1745 1879 1849 1880 2148
Ba 10 0 0 0 0 0
P 873 565 564 571 589 700
Zn 1064 677 674 677 682 862
Fuel dilution, %
1.5 1.8 1.6 0.5 0 < .1
Soot < .1 0 0 0 0 0
Water < .1 0 0 0 0 0
Viscosity, 100 C cSt
10.1 8.8 9 8.9 8.8 9.7
Code:
Vehicle mileage
36197 41947 48040 54610 60835 67070
Mileage on oil drain
5967 5750 6093 6570 6225 6235
Fe 5 4 5 9 7 4
Cr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ni 0 0 0 0 0 0
Al 1 2 2 2 2 2
Cu 3 1 3 3 3 5
Pb 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cd 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ag 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ti 0 0 0 0 0 0
V 0 0 0 0 0 0
Si 17 16 20 14 16 21
Na 2 2 3 2 3 4
K 2 0 1 0 0 0
Mo 39 40 40 35 42 43
Sb 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Li 0 0 0 0 0 0
B 131 126 105 96 109 86
Mg 6 7 10 6 8 8
Ca 2032 2059 2048 1758 2007 2178
Ba 0 0 0 0 0 0
P 594 669 678 557 595 650
Zn 817 740 780 648 673 760
Fuel dilution, %
1.3 0.7 1.3 1.1 2.1 1.1
Soot < .1 0.1 < .1 < .1 < .1 < .1
Water 0 0 0 0 0 0
Viscosity, 100 C cSt
9.4 9 9.2 9.3 8.8 9.5
Sorry about the chart - Its an Excel spreadsheet but it doesn't transfer well.
The Fe and Cu levels dropped after breakin and everything else is excellent. Si is typical of most new engines using RTV sealants.
Conclusion: there is no reason to run less tham 6k between changes in this service.
Last edited by a moderator: