Gary Allan
Thread starter
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2002
- Messages
- 39,798
I need you on the stand as Col. Nathan R. Jessep while I'm saying ..
..if false money was in the market due to mortgages ..and this money had no business being there ...and ...
Well, if what you say is true ..or rather imply ..then there is no need for a bail out. The state of the union is fine without the mortgage money that wasn't really there and it provided no growth in the economy and/or the market.
So what's this $700B for anyway, the Pablo's enhancement fund??
Hey, pal ..most of the future retirement money is in the market now. That is there due to employment. If our real employment isn't due to the watershed housing market ..then we have nothing to fear ..there is no recession ..no loss of jobs ..no side effects of the bubble bursting.
Again, what's this $700B for, anyway??
Some where ..some few have the "extract" of this false economy. Why should I (we) be the one's filling in the void that's leftover?? According to you there was no impact of the lack of an unsustainable housing market.
..if false money was in the market due to mortgages ..and this money had no business being there ...and ...
Well, if what you say is true ..or rather imply ..then there is no need for a bail out. The state of the union is fine without the mortgage money that wasn't really there and it provided no growth in the economy and/or the market.
So what's this $700B for anyway, the Pablo's enhancement fund??
Hey, pal ..most of the future retirement money is in the market now. That is there due to employment. If our real employment isn't due to the watershed housing market ..then we have nothing to fear ..there is no recession ..no loss of jobs ..no side effects of the bubble bursting.
Again, what's this $700B for, anyway??
Some where ..some few have the "extract" of this false economy. Why should I (we) be the one's filling in the void that's leftover?? According to you there was no impact of the lack of an unsustainable housing market.
