I'd rather d/l at home on my WiFi and have it there.
It's not like my music is going away. I'll just have to buy it from other sources. I suspect Amazon will still sell me one or more MP3 files.
Others can go on with their newfangled streaming and their witchcraft auto-shifting cars. I'll keep getting my books on tape and LPs.
Now get off my digital lawn you whippersnappers.
In all seriousness, I'm not sure I hear enough new music to warrant another $10/month service. I might buy one song a month at $1.99 or whatever they are. Paying $5 or $10 a month to stream music, much of which I already have makes no sense.
If I didn't have 75GB of music already in my library, it might make sense to subscribe.
But it's not like music that is aimed at me and my tastes is coming out in sufficient volume to warrant a streaming service.
Originally Posted by rooflessVW
Originally Posted by javacontour
I would rather buy individual songs than stream music on a device. I would rather choose than have an algorithm choose my music for me.
Not to mention sometimes I'm out where there is no wireless data coverage...
You're behind the times. On all the major steaming services you can select the exact song you want to listen to, curate your own playlists, and download music for offline use.
I currently have 12.7gb downloaded to my phone, to minimize my data usage.