Hey guys,
I just installed a new pair of rear shocks on my father's 92 Toyota Previa.
The van originally came with twin-tube rear shocks. I upgraded and installed a pair of KYB Gas-A-Just Monotube shocks.
Prior to the shock replacement, the L/R ride height measured 29.25" and the R/R ride height measured just over 30".
After the replacement, both sides measure 30".
The old rear shocks were completely blown and would not rebound when compressed. I am guessing that with properly functioning rear shocks, the ride height has stabilized in some way.
My dad is now claiming that the van sits higher than it ever has. I did some searching online and found the following explanation - is this correct?
Quote:
Second thing about monotubes. They require high gas pressure to operate. Gas pressure creates a shaft extension force. This force works directly against the weight of the chassis; essentially a static spring rate (constant force, does not increase/decrease with travel like a coil spring). The force is the gas pressure x the shaft diameter. The larger the shaft dia. or the gas pressure, the greater the extension force. If you install a monotube shock on a vehicle that originally comes with low gas twin tube shocks the ride height will increase due to the increased extension force, unless you provide a way to change ride height like adj. coilovers, shorter springs, etc. The difference between a monotube and twin tube gas pressure is 2 bar vs 20 bar; fairly substantial.
http://www.bimmerfest.com/forums/showpost.php?p=257761&postcount=10
In addition, the rear of the van sits about 2.5" higher than the front. I do not know if this is normal, or if this is indicative of worn front springs. Any Previa experts here? I'd hate to spent $95/spring at the dealer, since there are no known aftermarket front springs available.
Thanks in advance.
I just installed a new pair of rear shocks on my father's 92 Toyota Previa.
The van originally came with twin-tube rear shocks. I upgraded and installed a pair of KYB Gas-A-Just Monotube shocks.
Prior to the shock replacement, the L/R ride height measured 29.25" and the R/R ride height measured just over 30".
After the replacement, both sides measure 30".
The old rear shocks were completely blown and would not rebound when compressed. I am guessing that with properly functioning rear shocks, the ride height has stabilized in some way.
My dad is now claiming that the van sits higher than it ever has. I did some searching online and found the following explanation - is this correct?
Quote:
Second thing about monotubes. They require high gas pressure to operate. Gas pressure creates a shaft extension force. This force works directly against the weight of the chassis; essentially a static spring rate (constant force, does not increase/decrease with travel like a coil spring). The force is the gas pressure x the shaft diameter. The larger the shaft dia. or the gas pressure, the greater the extension force. If you install a monotube shock on a vehicle that originally comes with low gas twin tube shocks the ride height will increase due to the increased extension force, unless you provide a way to change ride height like adj. coilovers, shorter springs, etc. The difference between a monotube and twin tube gas pressure is 2 bar vs 20 bar; fairly substantial.
http://www.bimmerfest.com/forums/showpost.php?p=257761&postcount=10
In addition, the rear of the van sits about 2.5" higher than the front. I do not know if this is normal, or if this is indicative of worn front springs. Any Previa experts here? I'd hate to spent $95/spring at the dealer, since there are no known aftermarket front springs available.
Thanks in advance.
Last edited: