I'm all out - Mobil 2T replacement

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Jul 17, 2003
Messages
931
Location
New York
I'm down to my last bottle of Mobil 2T oil...
Been looking online at recommend equivelents, replacements.
Love love this stuff.

Whaddya guys using as your 2 stroke oil of choice...
There were blurbs that Honda brand is similar formula to the Mobil 2T I've come to love.
 
Last edited:
The only thing really close to that formula that I know of is the Castrol TTS 2-cycle oil. It was a real shame when Mobil quit providing that oil in North America. It was a great product.
 
I think it's either going to yamalube or Honda. Whatever is convenient...
I don't plan on spending minimum $8 shipping on 2T oil....but once I find the right one, I don't mind the shipping costs...
 
I have a bunch of Mobil 1 2T left over for my toys. However, in other equipment, I have switched to Castrol TT-s synthetic with good results.

We were required to use TT-S in our 53HP, Solo=(engine brand), motorglider. It always ran well and clean enough. However, it did have a bit of an acrid smell.

Back in my SeaDoo racing days, Golden Spectro was a favorite. Bombardier had SeaDoo brand oil in conventional and synthetic. However, neither SeaDoo oil held up all that well in highly modified engines. As they would wear out rapidly. Especially the exhaust side of the piston rings. The Golden Spectro was especially dirty and tended to foul plugs. However the engines lasted on it and the rings held up longer.

The Mobil 1 oil solved a number of problems and was clearly the best oil. I really cannot say if TT-s would have worked as well.
 
I bought a whole case of Aeroshell Sport Plus 2. Its the upgraded version of the old Pennzoil "air cooled" 2 stroke oil that was HIGHLY regarded by the Ultralight aircraft crowd. This stuff smells exactly like epoxy resin. Supposed to have special corrosion inhibitors for motors that will see long intervals without use etc.
Shell, Pennzoil's parent company has developed this new oil for use in light aircraft and based it off the "air cooled" product so It would have to be a good product.
Might be worth trying.
 
lucky i have enough for several more years. amazing stuff-easy the best 2 stroke oil of all time.i recommend amzoil sabre. good results with Pennzoil Full Synthetic outboard also.
 
I have 1/2 qt left. My brother I and ordered some Saber as a replacement. I personally haven't opened it yet but he's used it.
 
Originally Posted By: Steve S
The Mobil 2T oil was by far the best oil I ever used.


Considering your fervent zeal for Mobil 2T, there must have been some fantastic results, if not miracles performed from using it.

Would you care to share some examples of the benefits with us?
 
I have about 15-20 qts/pints of Mobil 1 2T or MX2T - so I am still set for a while. I use all year round on two 6 1/2 HP Lawn Boy mowers and a Toro snowblower with a 5 HP Suzuki engine. For those of you who never got a chance to use it, it is head and shoulders above all those other mineral based, 2 cycle oils. If you value, next to no smoke, no odors and no deposits - accept no substitutes. It was formulated for European Grand Prix 2 cycle motorcycles! For usage in our string trimmers and lawn mowers, it's overkill.

Now that it has been killed off, by Exxonmobil, there is another choice, which by all accounts, is the equivalent of Mobil 1 2T.
On the Gardenweb forum (on 07/21/07), someone compared Mobil 1 2T, Echo synthetic 2 cycle oil and Torco GP7. A Redmax BCZ 2400 string trimmer was the test tool. The Echo 2 cycle oil was outclassed, but the Torco GP7 synthetic 2 cycle oil was found to be every bit as good as Mobil 2T. I hear that Torco GP7 is pricy, but as they say, "oil is a lot cheaper than engine parts".
 
"it is head and shoulders above all those other mineral based, 2 cycle oils."

I still don't understand how the above premise can be substantiated.

I've been using conventional API TC3 rated oil for decades on engines new and old. Oldest is over thirty years old and the newest is three years old. I see barely a whisp of smoke in the new engines only when started and only a slight bit more smoke upon start up of the old engines. After the first two seconds or so, no smoke.

All engines start and run well. I get no plug fouling, no build up in the exhaust ports or mufflers. I have not seen a reduction in engine power and fuel consumption hasn't changed.
Having owned and used the same 30 year old engines from new, with no rebuilds and no appreciable loss of performance, I'd say that's an impressive achievement. I'm certain the cost of the oil I'm using is probably less as well.

So, how can any product claim to "head and shoulders above" what I'm using. What could it possibly deliver that would make it "head and shoulders above?

Give us some examples of how/why it's so much better. If you can't, why would you make such an endorsement of the product?
 
Originally Posted By: boraticus
"it is head and shoulders above all those other mineral based, 2 cycle oils."

I still don't understand how the above premise can be substantiated.

I've been using conventional API TC3 rated oil for decades on engines new and old. Oldest is over thirty years old and the newest is three years old. I see barely a whisp of smoke in the new engines only when started and only a slight bit more smoke upon start up of the old engines. After the first two seconds or so, no smoke.

All engines start and run well. I get no plug fouling, no build up in the exhaust ports or mufflers. I have not seen a reduction in engine power and fuel consumption hasn't changed.
Having owned and used the same 30 year old engines from new, with no rebuilds and no appreciable loss of performance, I'd say that's an impressive achievement. I'm certain the cost of the oil I'm using is probably less as well.

So, how can any product claim to "head and shoulders above" what I'm using. What could it possibly deliver that would make it "head and shoulders above?

Give us some examples of how/why it's so much better. If you can't, why would you make such an endorsement of the product?


That's an easy question. It is not so much the manufacturer's claims, but the 2 cycle OWNER'S ringing endorsements of Mobil 1 2T.

1) I would guess that none of equipment you own, over your 30 years is powerful enough or demanding enough to test your oil's capabilities. If you told me that you raced 2 cycle motorcycles and had engine teardowns using mineral oils (with glowing results), I would be swayed - maybe.

2) I remember looking at forum dedicated to chainsaw users and arborists. Those guys did this for a living, not for a weekend. Many of them also lamented the "passing" of Mobil 1 2T a couple of years ago. They too, were searching for a substitute.

3) When you look at the exhaust ports and plug condition of the tons of two cycle trimmers and mowers that are "left on the curb" for the garbage man. What kind of 2 cycle oils do you think, those owners used, mineral or synthetic?

In summary, just be happy with the results of conventional API TC3 you are using. Some folks, are never going to be convinced, and are forever skeptical. This is the USA, I am glad we have a choice of products.
 
Yeah....OK, but what are the clear advantages of Mobil 1 2T?

My engines all start easy, run well, are strong and last long. They don't smoke, make plenty of power, don't foul the plug.

What am I missing that the Mobil 1 2T would provide, other than stories of lament?

I just find it irksome when people make claims such as "head and shoulders above" everything else when in fact, it's marginally better, at best.

Reality isn't very forgiving sometimes.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom