JHZR2
Staff member
yes, but with it done automatically, it is easier and accessible to everyone without thinking twice!
JMH
JMH
Well, I guess if the cost per mile were cheaper running premium (i know my mom's Avalon gets better mileage with premium) then it would be cost effective but not when the Jeep Grand Cherokee can achieve the same ratings without the need for premium fuel.quote:
Originally posted by JHZR2:
IMO that is a worthless point... SOOOOOO many companies and engines are like this these days with the modern sensors, etc.quote:
Originally posted by JeepZJ4.0:
Oh, the 4 runners require premium gasoline to get their maximum power rating sooo I'll pass.
heck, dodge neon DOHC engines from long ago did this same thing.
JMH
IMO that is a worthless point... SOOOOOO many companies and engines are like this these days with the modern sensors, etc.quote:
Originally posted by JeepZJ4.0:
Oh, the 4 runners require premium gasoline to get their maximum power rating sooo I'll pass.
Even with the old engines you could advance the timing to get more power with premium. New engines/control systems just do it automatically.quote:
Originally posted by JHZR2:
IMO that is a worthless point... SOOOOOO many companies and engines are like this these days with the modern sensors, etc.
I second the Scout (I'll take it with the half-a-V8 4 banger), but I would also want a Bronco with a 300 cubic inch inline six.quote:
Originally posted by Airframer509:
I like my '72 Scout for an SUV, and I would take an Excursion with a Powerstroke!