Originally Posted By: VeeDubb
To be exposed only to systemic risk, you're portfolio has to mirror "the market.". In this day and age, the hard to know where the market boundary is. Back in the old days it was the S&P 500. Now even global markets are highly correlated. And you can argue that currencies and commodities should also be included to further diversify away aggregate risk. Most 401ks only include highly correlated investments which is a joke.
I, too, believe that everything is correlated nowadays given the speed information is processed. That's why I disagree that bonds are "safe". I think they are as exposed to systemic risk as stocks, gold or any other vehicle. [start rant] The only differential for bonds is that they are not residual value but it usually doesn't matter to the small scale investors because when it's time to exercise that right, there is nothing left in the pot for you anyway. [end rant]
Anyway, since the market is so correlated, you can eliminate non-systemic risk cheaply by sticking with a small scale portfolio instead of trying to build a portfolio that includes everything.
To be exposed only to systemic risk, you're portfolio has to mirror "the market.". In this day and age, the hard to know where the market boundary is. Back in the old days it was the S&P 500. Now even global markets are highly correlated. And you can argue that currencies and commodities should also be included to further diversify away aggregate risk. Most 401ks only include highly correlated investments which is a joke.

Anyway, since the market is so correlated, you can eliminate non-systemic risk cheaply by sticking with a small scale portfolio instead of trying to build a portfolio that includes everything.