Interesting to ponder the difference between a theoretician/scientist and an inventor/experimenter. Might one say that while the scientist speculates, the experimenter places Nature herself on the rack in his "experiments" so as to torture from Nature her secrets?
Furthermore, the image of the experimenter attempting to gain control over Nature so as to benefit society in general is questionable. I've a feeling experimenters seek to gain control over Nature so as to gain power for themselves. Indeed, back in the day, it almost seems as if some sought to make themselves a god of sorts.
On the flip side, given the chaotic "nature" of Nature, a skeptic wonders whether natural laws themselves are but another creation of man?
[ January 04, 2004, 08:49 AM: Message edited by: ex_MGB ]