I hear you, and it's FORCED insurance.
I'd like to see it changed. Right now in the US, your SS "contribution" is matched by your employer. I'd like to see the option of one of those being an employee directed sum. So instead of approximately 12% of my wages going into SS counting both parts of the "contribution" let the employee direct his/her half of that contribution.
If I want to put it into an index fund or something that will actually grow instead of funding the ponzy scheme, then let the taxpayer do that. Leaving the other 1/2 to keep the system going and provide the benefits for early death or what not.
Instead of smartly investing SS monies, they are immediately spent, making SS a true ponzy scheme.
Originally Posted By: JHZR2
Originally Posted By: Pop_Rivit
The reality is you can "retire" at any age as long as you can afford to do so. Of course, if you didn't financially plan and are hoping for Social Security to tide you over then you're stuck with whatever age you can start drawing.
+1. There are smart decisions and not as smart decisions. Lots of high earners living in big homes, and that is their retirement, as they dont really have much else.
Unfortunately raising the retirement ager may be the only way to make people start to think about how to take their own conrol to stop working when they want to. if they dont, whose problem is it?
In the US, SS is an "insurance". Nothing more than a small check to enable that one can afford food and some mobility. Shouldnt be more than that - it has caused people to be reliant on SS, which IMO is stupid.
At my age, Im not counting on being able to retire at any age, and Ill be picking up all the debt costs for everyone currently on or who will be on SS/Medicare. Not fun. Im doubting that there will be an allowable age - my peers who arent able to retire on their own dime will be sent to the salt mines. But Im saving hard and hope to work on my schedule and have my hobbies, not be caught in the 9to5 forever.