How are the non-Torque Converter using Automatics?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Originally Posted By: XS650
Originally Posted By: 440Magnum
Originally Posted By: XS650
Originally Posted By: brandini
I believe CVT's still have a torque converter.


Prius and Camry Hybrids CVTs don't have a TC. Nor do Lexus Hybrids and IIRC, nor do Ford or Altima hybrids.


Hybrids do not have a true CVT. They basically have a differential with an electric motor-generator on one shaft, the gasoline engine on the another, and the drive wheels on the third. Its not even really a "transmission" at all, which is why the manufacturers refer to it as a "drive system."

All the true CVTs do use a torque convertor, but its locked a much larger percentage of the time than in a conventional automatic.




It transmits power and is continuously changes ratios for the internal combustion engine from infinite reduction (seriously torque limited though) as he car starts to move to whatever the reduction is at cruising speed.

The common term is eCVT, electronic Continuously Variable Transmission. The function of the transmission makes it a CVT, not which combination of parts are in it.

The gearset isn't aren't a differential, the mechanical gear element is a planetary gearset (it could be done with a differential) with the engine on one input, one motor generator on another input and the 2nd motor generator hooked to the output. The 2 M/G units recirculate torque in the planetary gearset changing the ratio between the engine and output of the gearset. It's not a conventional way to do the job, but is is a continuously variable transmission.



Yes, you're right on there. There is an interesting and esoteric debate about whether the HSD transmissions are truly CVTs. Nope, they bear virtually nothing in common with the "cone and belt/chain" units more commonly seen. A logical "compromise description" might be that the Toyota/Lex design is actually a one-speed auto, in which that one speed just happens to be infinitely variable. At the end of the day, though, it functions as an exceptionally well behaved CVT. Especially in the Camry (I've driven the Prius and the Camry extensively, and had one try of a Highlander Hybrid), the behavior is superb. It's very much like a turbojet engine -- slight, non-objectionable delay in throttle response (not like the all-day delay with a turbofan), and the rpms are pretty much always right where they need to be for what you're trying to do. I just LOVE how this car responds (though I could live with another 50 hp or so -- total system hp in the Camry hybrid is 187 -- very close to the previous gen 3.0L V-6 I owned a few years back).

By comparison, I liken the wife's Avalon, with 270 hp and a 5-spd auto (the 6-spd came the next year) to a gorilla. It wins in the brute force contest, hands down, but it does all that crude, old-fashioned -- shifting. Ewwwwwwww. Once you get used to seamless power delivery, multi-speed transmissions suddenly look like a Fred Flintstone accessory.
 
Originally Posted By: ekpolk
By comparison, I liken the wife's Avalon, with 270 hp and a 5-spd auto (the 6-spd came the next year) to a gorilla. It wins in the brute force contest, hands down, but it does all that crude, old-fashioned -- shifting. Ewwwwwwww. Once you get used to seamless power delivery, multi-speed transmissions suddenly look like a Fred Flintstone accessory.

That's why I have the best of both worlds-- a CVT paired with a torquey, VQ35DE engine in a relatively light family sedan.
grin.gif


No whine, no moan, no rubber band feel-- just a "whoosh" of seamless power.
 
Quote:
Once you get used to seamless power delivery, multi-speed transmissions suddenly look like a Fred Flintstone accessory.


Fred's feet would eventually heal themselves when fatigued or damaged.

I'll let the fatter wallets do the in field R&D. When Joey's Trans & Go has a special on CVT rebuilds, I'll probably be in the market.
 
Originally Posted By: Gary Allan
Quote:
Once you get used to seamless power delivery, multi-speed transmissions suddenly look like a Fred Flintstone accessory.


Fred's feet would eventually heal themselves when fatigued or damaged.

I'll let the fatter wallets do the in field R&D. When Joey's Trans & Go has a special on CVT rebuilds, I'll probably be in the market.

I have yet to see any evidence that the newer CVTs have higher failure rates than conventional stepped gear automatics. Many of the concerns about CVT failures are based on experiences with older, first generation CVTs, not current ones.
 
While newer CVT's are indeed reliable, you will not see them used in any real hi output application.

They simply lack the torque capacity to stand up to a really powerful engine.

Even on 4 and six cylinder apps they have severe torque management written into their software to protect the trans.

And the owners ARE performing R&D for the manufacturers. But it's that way for all new technology.
 
Originally Posted By: Spazdog

I still have a theory that all traffic jams are caused by automatic transmissions. Because no one with a manual or an automated manual would (could) go that slow.


I think you are definitely correct. It mechanically buffers so a driver can operate without really appreciating physics, this causes a start-stop wave over wave over wave, which ultimately creates periodic flow. This would not be able to happen as much with pevalent MTs.
 
Originally Posted By: XS650


The common term is eCVT, electronic Continuously Variable Transmission. The function of the transmission makes it a CVT, not which combination of parts are in it.


Semantics. Its an integrated drive system with two torque INPUTS, one of which can be reversed into a torque output. It most definitely is not a "transmission" in the historical use of the word.


Originally Posted By: XS650

The gearset isn't aren't a differential, the mechanical gear element is a planetary gearset



Its a differential. Differentials can be and often are implemented with planetary gearsets. Just look in a lot of 4x4 transfer cases. In fact a natural and handy by-product of using a planetary differential is that its very simple to get unequal torque split between the outputs (say if you want 70% torque to the rear wheels, 30% to the front.)
 
Originally Posted By: ItsuMitsubishi
Do modern CVTs still have that 'rubber band' response characteristic? I remember driving a Vue with the 2.2 Ecotec and CVT... it was kinda painful to listen to. That combination sounded like a Jack Lalanne juicer with a really crusty carrot jamming the blade: coarse!!


No odd sounds at all. My only gripe is that it does take longer for it to get all the way from overdrive to the minimum allowable ratio when you floor it than it takes for a conventional automatic to do a convertor unlock and downshift. But it compensates by being able to then stay right on the horsepower peak of the engine until you're going whatever speed you want.
 
Originally Posted By: ekpolk

Yes, you're right on there. There is an interesting and esoteric debate about whether the HSD transmissions are truly CVTs. Nope, they bear virtually nothing in common with the "cone and belt/chain" units more commonly seen.


Or with ANY transmission, because of the second input (the motor generator) which can instantly add power or regenerative braking. They're a WONDERFUL design, absolutely elegant solution to the hybrid drive problem. But they're no transmission.

Originally Posted By: ekpolk
By comparison, I liken the wife's Avalon, with 270 hp and a 5-spd auto (the 6-spd came the next year) to a gorilla. It wins in the brute force contest, hands down, but it does all that crude, old-fashioned -- shifting. Ewwwwwwww. Once you get used to seamless power delivery, multi-speed transmissions suddenly look like a Fred Flintstone accessory.


Gotta disagree. The single thing I love most about getting into my '69 R/T is that you can feel those crisp, firm, Torqueflite shifts at any speed and throttle opeining... firm but unobtrusive. Then if you choose to stand on it hard, your ears are greeted by a bark of burning rubber whenever it shifts from 1st to 2nd or 2nd to 3rd.
shocked.gif
Try THAT with a CVT!
 
Originally Posted By: SteveSRT8
While newer CVT's are indeed reliable, you will not see them used in any real hi output application.



Is this considered "high output"? Just sayin'...

Sure, many of the existing CVT's are limited in their ability to handle torque, but there's nothing inherent to the design itself to limit its capacity.
 
Originally Posted By: The Critic

I have yet to see any evidence that the newer CVTs have higher failure rates than conventional stepped gear automatics. Many of the concerns about CVT failures are based on experiences with older, first generation CVTs, not current ones.


While the evidence is pretty limited, Ford's CVT has shown to be pretty darned reliable. The potential issue is that if it does need serviced, even minor repairs are going to run serious $$, and most major repairs aren't even done--you just have to replace the unit.

I ran into this when I called around just to try and have the internal filter changed (when it was due). No independent shop would touch it, and half of the dealers I talked to didn't even know it had an internal filter (or told me that it should never be changed...). I ended up doing it myself 3 weeks after breaking my collarbone, which really wasn't fun...

I'm definitely doing the long-term R&D on a transmission they no longer even make, so I'll see how long it goes. I'm creeping up on 100K, and it's been flawless so far, and a real treat to drive.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom