Coastal exposures are complex because the areas closest to the water will obviously have the greatest exposure, but even areas that are within hours of it can be subject to more severe weather-related claims. From an insurer standpoint, that is an extra exposure that cannot always be adequately priced for if the rate regulatory environment is not supportive. Capacity is always an issue, obviously more so when you're closer to the water.....but insurers will watch how much saturation they have in an area.Well, not that I disagree completely with your statement but for the OP it is complacency. You shopped around, he hasn't.
He should be shopping like crazy to get answers. It's possible he is overpaying.
There are areas in Florida that are less hurricane prone. Northeast Florida Yulee area is less prone to hurricanes than most of NC, SC and all of Florida and Alabama
Its one reason besides location we almost bought there, we actually live in a more hurricane prone area in North Carolina than if we did live in Florida but agree, Florida has to be harder to insure but Yulee area maybe a little less so. (MAYBE)
View attachment 161015
Every carrier is going to be in a different spot, both from a book health, capacity and rate adequacy standpoint. That is more/less why there is often some variation in the prices. But in some areas, everyone's book is in a bad spot with limited capacity. In those situations you are unlikely to find drastic savings by shopping; and if you do, I'd be skeptical.
Last edited: