I know it's maybe a little crazy to expect it in this forum
, but I've got a filter question that's a little long.
Background: I've got a 1965 Sunbeam Tiger, for those who are unfamiliar it's a British 2-door convertible that had a Ford 260 (or 289 later on) V-8 installed under the hood. In doing this, they had to install a remote oil system on this for the FL1A filter.
Well, last weekend my remote oil system failed in my friend's driveway, leaving a huge stain and a burning desire to get rid of the 40-year-old remote oil system. Come to find out there are two options.
1. Install a Ford 90-degree adapter for the filter, and use a slightly smaller filter, the PH3600 (sorry about the Fram reference, it's not my link)
http://www.tigersunited.com/resources/Dealer_Accessories/mp-FilterAdapter3.asp
2. Install a smaller height filter straight onto the block, namely an STP 3512.
Here are my questions: Would I be losing any protection by going with the STP small filter? The STP filter is the only one I could find locally in that size/application. It seems to me that if a smaller filter would have worked on this engine, then Ford or Sunbeam would have used it. However, I'm also guessing that filter technology has progressed in the last 40 years to allow a smaller, more efficient filter. But, I'm not sure, which is why I'm posting here.
I intend to use the STP filter long enough to start the car at a minimum and put it on a trailer for a move, but after that I'm considering using the 90-degree adapter in the link for general peace of mind with a larger filter. If I go this route, what would be the general consensus for an oil and filter combination? I've got 500 miles on a freshly rebuilt engine, and I was going to use Castrol GTX 10w30 for another 500 miles and switch to Mobil 1 10w30, but what filter would you guys recommend?
Thanks in advance. I have to say I read through the forum a bit as I just changed the oil in my Yukon, and I want to take it back in to change it out since I used a Fram oil filter without knowing any better... Forgive me!!!
Background: I've got a 1965 Sunbeam Tiger, for those who are unfamiliar it's a British 2-door convertible that had a Ford 260 (or 289 later on) V-8 installed under the hood. In doing this, they had to install a remote oil system on this for the FL1A filter.
Well, last weekend my remote oil system failed in my friend's driveway, leaving a huge stain and a burning desire to get rid of the 40-year-old remote oil system. Come to find out there are two options.
1. Install a Ford 90-degree adapter for the filter, and use a slightly smaller filter, the PH3600 (sorry about the Fram reference, it's not my link)
http://www.tigersunited.com/resources/Dealer_Accessories/mp-FilterAdapter3.asp
2. Install a smaller height filter straight onto the block, namely an STP 3512.
Here are my questions: Would I be losing any protection by going with the STP small filter? The STP filter is the only one I could find locally in that size/application. It seems to me that if a smaller filter would have worked on this engine, then Ford or Sunbeam would have used it. However, I'm also guessing that filter technology has progressed in the last 40 years to allow a smaller, more efficient filter. But, I'm not sure, which is why I'm posting here.
I intend to use the STP filter long enough to start the car at a minimum and put it on a trailer for a move, but after that I'm considering using the 90-degree adapter in the link for general peace of mind with a larger filter. If I go this route, what would be the general consensus for an oil and filter combination? I've got 500 miles on a freshly rebuilt engine, and I was going to use Castrol GTX 10w30 for another 500 miles and switch to Mobil 1 10w30, but what filter would you guys recommend?
Thanks in advance. I have to say I read through the forum a bit as I just changed the oil in my Yukon, and I want to take it back in to change it out since I used a Fram oil filter without knowing any better... Forgive me!!!