AMC
Thread starter
Originally Posted By: FastGame
Hmmm IMO true happiness comes from 2 bikes
Keep the KLR and get something like Sport Touring ?
I had thought of that too, I was considering keeping the KLR and getting something like a Ninja 1000 or a FJ-09. The problem is that the tiger 800 XC and the KLR are too similar to bother keeping the KLR. The KLR is just too slow and not enough power for me to keep anymore.
If I really wanted to keep a bike like the KLR, I would just settle for the 800 XC. The seating position, ground clearance, suspension feel, ergonomics and off road capability of these 2 bikes are very similar IMO. The big place where the tiger and KLR separate is the engine and mechanical complexity. The Tiger has a buttery smooth, powerful and high revving inline triple. The KLR has a low revving, highly vibratory, weakling of a thumper.
The biggest thing I am going to miss about the KLR is the simplicity and ease of maintenance. Oil and air filter changes take 5 minutes, Adjusting the chain is a snap and I really have no use for a motorcycle mechanic at all with the KLR. Any of my other choices will be much harder and more expensive to work on, requiring a certified mechanic for a lot of things that I would normally handle myself. That being said, I am willing to swallow my pride a little and pay for the more complex services that a more modern and powerful motorcycle would need.
Hmmm IMO true happiness comes from 2 bikes

I had thought of that too, I was considering keeping the KLR and getting something like a Ninja 1000 or a FJ-09. The problem is that the tiger 800 XC and the KLR are too similar to bother keeping the KLR. The KLR is just too slow and not enough power for me to keep anymore.
If I really wanted to keep a bike like the KLR, I would just settle for the 800 XC. The seating position, ground clearance, suspension feel, ergonomics and off road capability of these 2 bikes are very similar IMO. The big place where the tiger and KLR separate is the engine and mechanical complexity. The Tiger has a buttery smooth, powerful and high revving inline triple. The KLR has a low revving, highly vibratory, weakling of a thumper.
The biggest thing I am going to miss about the KLR is the simplicity and ease of maintenance. Oil and air filter changes take 5 minutes, Adjusting the chain is a snap and I really have no use for a motorcycle mechanic at all with the KLR. Any of my other choices will be much harder and more expensive to work on, requiring a certified mechanic for a lot of things that I would normally handle myself. That being said, I am willing to swallow my pride a little and pay for the more complex services that a more modern and powerful motorcycle would need.
Last edited: