The Ranger has these wheels
which are 15 inch, and it has Continental tires, nice, but manufactured in 2007. But the wheels on the Ranger are badly rusted and sheets have delaminated and fell off. The one in the photo is the best of the four.
Anyway, I have an old beater Aerostar (92) that appears to have the same bolt pattern, and has steel wheels in decent condition, but are 14 inch, and the tires are 2011 manufacture date (Mastercraft though). Given the tire sizes, it will only represent a 2.5% difference in circumference or about 2 mph less than indicated at 70 mph.
Tomorrow morning I intend to switch them between the two and run the 14s on the Ranger. The Ranger wheels will go on the Aerostar. If all clearances are good, I'm done. Then next time I need tires, I will see about new 15 inch wheels for the Ranger.
What do you think? By the way, the Ranger is sort of a beater too, so I am not too concerned about an old-school wheel size on it.
which are 15 inch, and it has Continental tires, nice, but manufactured in 2007. But the wheels on the Ranger are badly rusted and sheets have delaminated and fell off. The one in the photo is the best of the four.
Anyway, I have an old beater Aerostar (92) that appears to have the same bolt pattern, and has steel wheels in decent condition, but are 14 inch, and the tires are 2011 manufacture date (Mastercraft though). Given the tire sizes, it will only represent a 2.5% difference in circumference or about 2 mph less than indicated at 70 mph.
Tomorrow morning I intend to switch them between the two and run the 14s on the Ranger. The Ranger wheels will go on the Aerostar. If all clearances are good, I'm done. Then next time I need tires, I will see about new 15 inch wheels for the Ranger.
What do you think? By the way, the Ranger is sort of a beater too, so I am not too concerned about an old-school wheel size on it.