Note- I'm not writing this because I'm for or against the bailout/GM/the Volt. I just noticed that this isn't really a news article. It seems to be more of an opinion piece.
I would like to point out one thing about the article posted by the OP:
It is posted on Yahoo! News, but it's actually an article taken from The Blaze, which is Glenn Beck's news website.
Link to Wikipedia article on The Blaze.
The article clearly has an anti-GM slant, and it seems to be an opinion piece, not a news article. Also, the only quotes in it are taken from other articles. It seems the author took some news from somewhere else and put an anti-gm, anti-bailout spin on it.
Here is an example from the article:
Quote:
As per the arrangement, GM started exporting Michigan-made Volts to China. However, it is highly unlikely that GM will sell many of the unsuccessful vehicles.
Plus, no quotes or other info say Volt production would be moved from the US to China. It only says that Volts may be produced in China as a way to avoid tariffs on imported vehicles.
The article seems to be written in a way to make the reader think GM is moving volt production from the US to China, even though there is no info in the article proving GM is planning on doing that.
It's a strange "news" article, if that's what it is. It's written much more like an opinion piece.
Here is more of the article's opinion, that doesn't even seem to be disguised as news:
Quote:
Two final thoughts: First, considering that all of GM’s EV development was financed with taxpayer dollars, it seems perfectly reasonable that many people are upset with the car manufacturer. On the other hand, given what appears to be GM’s failure to develop a successful, affordable and stable EV, one might feel compelled to say of the Shanghai deal, “They can have it.”
Second, given the fact that Federal government helped itself to millions and millions of taxpayer dollars under the pretense that it was going to combat high unemployment by creating “green jobs,” it would seem that moving research and development (and possibly manufacturing) overseas is slightly, well, counterproductive.
I would like to point out one thing about the article posted by the OP:
It is posted on Yahoo! News, but it's actually an article taken from The Blaze, which is Glenn Beck's news website.
Link to Wikipedia article on The Blaze.
The article clearly has an anti-GM slant, and it seems to be an opinion piece, not a news article. Also, the only quotes in it are taken from other articles. It seems the author took some news from somewhere else and put an anti-gm, anti-bailout spin on it.
Here is an example from the article:
Quote:
As per the arrangement, GM started exporting Michigan-made Volts to China. However, it is highly unlikely that GM will sell many of the unsuccessful vehicles.
Plus, no quotes or other info say Volt production would be moved from the US to China. It only says that Volts may be produced in China as a way to avoid tariffs on imported vehicles.
The article seems to be written in a way to make the reader think GM is moving volt production from the US to China, even though there is no info in the article proving GM is planning on doing that.
It's a strange "news" article, if that's what it is. It's written much more like an opinion piece.
Here is more of the article's opinion, that doesn't even seem to be disguised as news:
Quote:
Two final thoughts: First, considering that all of GM’s EV development was financed with taxpayer dollars, it seems perfectly reasonable that many people are upset with the car manufacturer. On the other hand, given what appears to be GM’s failure to develop a successful, affordable and stable EV, one might feel compelled to say of the Shanghai deal, “They can have it.”
Second, given the fact that Federal government helped itself to millions and millions of taxpayer dollars under the pretense that it was going to combat high unemployment by creating “green jobs,” it would seem that moving research and development (and possibly manufacturing) overseas is slightly, well, counterproductive.
Last edited: