We usually agree that the government has rules for they but not for me, but I disagree with you on this one. Forcing an insurer to insure every vehicle or every person would be counterproductive to the public good. The point of having multiple insurers is for rates to be competitive. To be cheaper insurers try to minimize their potential for loss.Lol, who forcing Geico to be an insurance company? They choose to be one, so they should be required to insurance all automobiles.
But in your head telling people to go out and buy another vehicle that is insurable makes sense?
For example, no insurer would want to insure someone with lots of claims. So many states have come up with various versions of shared risk pools. All the insurers pay in, and if one of those people causes a huge loss, the pool helps pay.
The point is to keep insurance affordable for everyone, not entitle everyone to insurance. If you have lots of claims, or a DUI, or drive the wrong kind of car, thats your problem. No one is forcing anyone to drive at all, or drive a CT. But if you do, you need insurance.
In theory if you can afford a CT you should be able to afford to post a bond to self insure - no?