Respectfully, you are not making any sense. No one, at least not in the US, forces you to undertake a certain job or line of work, nor a sub-speciality within any such jobs or line of work. If you decide you want to do something - let's say dentistry - you have to pass certain requirements to make sure that your are competent and you don't injure people. That's generally how regulation works in the US. We don't force people or businesses to do things in the first instance, but if the person or business choses to do certain things, we try to have rules and requirements to make sure that they are done responsibly - so health care providers don't injure patients, so banks don't lose your money, so cars don't have defects that injure drivers and pedestrians, etc. If Geico doesn't want to insure a certain vehicle, I don't think you are going to find many people who want to force them to do so. The question to me is why would a rational business turn down a line of business - what are they seeing with these trucks that makes them unattractive to insure? Some folks above have offered good hypotheses. What is surprising to me is that they don't continue in the business but at a premium rate that makes it unlikely they will have a business - in other words offer to "insure" the vehicle, but for an annual premium equaling the current value of the vehicle. Pointless true , but then they can avoid any controversy. Kind of like when a car repair shop quotes you a ridiculous price - that is their way of saying that they don't want to deal with the customer, or the customer's car.