"No....CAFE stopped production of large cars with V8's... so to get a large vehicle with V8 you had to get a truck, which are not subject to same mpg standards."
Actually, increased efficiency caused most V-8s to go away. To get "power" in 1975 you needed a V-8. Who needs a V-8 today when DOHC V-6 engines routinely put out 225+ horsepower? When I raced a Porsche 944 with a relatively anemic 143 HP, I never had any trouble embarassing Mustang GTs on the track, even though my 944 had exactly HALF the displacement of the 5.0 'stangs. It's all about efficiency. Just look at the new VWs with the turbo 1.8L thimble-sized engine -- those Jettas could likely outrun a Crown Victoria V-8 police cruiser if desired. With engineering and efficiency like this, who needs 10,000 cubic inches? CAFE ain't the V-8 killer here -- advanced engine design is.
[ March 01, 2004, 06:07 PM: Message edited by: TC ]
Actually, increased efficiency caused most V-8s to go away. To get "power" in 1975 you needed a V-8. Who needs a V-8 today when DOHC V-6 engines routinely put out 225+ horsepower? When I raced a Porsche 944 with a relatively anemic 143 HP, I never had any trouble embarassing Mustang GTs on the track, even though my 944 had exactly HALF the displacement of the 5.0 'stangs. It's all about efficiency. Just look at the new VWs with the turbo 1.8L thimble-sized engine -- those Jettas could likely outrun a Crown Victoria V-8 police cruiser if desired. With engineering and efficiency like this, who needs 10,000 cubic inches? CAFE ain't the V-8 killer here -- advanced engine design is.
[ March 01, 2004, 06:07 PM: Message edited by: TC ]