Fresno County Sues Scotch Tape Company

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Jan 30, 2007
Messages
17,501
Location
Clovis, CA
http://www.fresnobee.com/263/story/487998.html


Quote:
In a case that proves that size really does matter, 3M has agreed to pay almost $700,000 to settle a Fresno County case that alleged the company sold undersized adhesive tapes.

Fresno County prosecutors made their case stick by showing that 3M's Scotch and Tartan brand adhesive and packaging tapes were 6% narrower than their packaging said.

"They knew what the width was, and they seemed to want to exaggerate it," said Alan Yengoyan, the Fresno County deputy district attorney who prosecuted the case.

Under the settlement announced Thursday, 3M agreed to change its labels. It also will pay Fresno County $600,000 in civil penalties and an additional $75,000 into a state trust fund to benefit county and state weights and measures offices. The company also will pay $18,000 to the state Division of Measurement Standards, which investigated the case.

In settling the case, 3M did not admit liability or guilt. Company officials could not be reached for comment Thursday evening.

The case involved violations of the state and federal Fair Packaging and Labeling Act, Yengoyan said.

A tape that was labeled for "1-inch use" measured 0.94 of an inch. That 6% deficiency also showed up on the company's other tape products.

"There is a required dimension for the exact measurement to be put on products," Yengoyan said. "We are increasingly finding it is not always done."

Yengoyan said the case originated with inspectors from the Fresno office of the state Division of Measurement Standards, who brought it to the county's attention.

The investigation began in 2006, Yengoyan said, and 3M and the county have been in settlement negotiations since last summer.

Yengoyan said the company did provide the county with information about its production lines. He added: "3M was cooperative, even though they did not agree to admitting any wrongdoing."

Sacramento lawyer James Mattesich, who represented 3M as outside counsel, said Thursday afternoon that he was unable to comment without the company's permission.



Crazy!
crazy2.gif
 
Originally Posted By: Pablo
This is for those who say big companies own our country.

And for China off brands - 0.90" wide 1 inch tape is fine!! Fresno Co won't know who to sue!
Pablo this in my opinion has earned you the master honor. I like your comment it is so true.
 
All that is needed to make the big bucks is a great attorney. Got to figure how to sue the government officials some how. They all have some how become very wealthy serving us.
 
It's too bad there's not some kind of regulation that covers asphalt and pavement quality; I would love to sue them for being in violation of that.
mad.gif
 
Originally Posted By: Pablo
This is for those who say big companies own our country.

And for China off brands - 0.90" wide 1 inch tape is fine!! Fresno Co won't know who to sue!


Pablo,
you've a good point. When I go to the China shop, I expect to be gypped at the specs advertised on the package (in aborted english even), but am prepared to sacrifice my 99c.

If I buy a $3 name brand, I'm shocked that they would be a thou undersize.
 
6% narrower means an instant savings of 6% in material costs at the expense of the consumer. I wonder if the package said '1" wide' or '25mm wide'

In any case, it's misrepresenting product specifications so good job, Fresno.
 
So every 16th roll they make is pure profit.

As for the imported stuff, the officials should just confisicate undersize stuff. The importers woud get the size problem sorted out real quick.

Ah, heck, they should just confisicate the 3M tape instead of the big fine (that's just money changing hands). That would get 3M to sort out the size issue too.
 
Quote:
(that's just money changing hands)


Yes ..I'm still looking for the corrective compensatory action to the alleged victim consumer here.

It's essentially a "shake down" by the Fresno County gubmit.
 
Originally Posted By: Gary Allan
It's essentially a "shake down" by the Fresno County gubmit.


Yes it sure is. I would've been fine with it if the tape was made in China, but 3M tape is USA made and good quality; h e l, all of there stuff is good quality. There ought to be some way to sue Fresno County.
 
It may be made in the USA and good quality, but is it as per the advertised dimensions ?

I just bought 17000 brass tubes 25.4mm OD +0, -0.20, 48' long.

Did I check that I got what I asked for ?

'course I did.

What's so hard with 3M providing 1" tape ?...particularly when they are providing the specification ?
 
Originally Posted By: Shannow
What's so hard with 3M providing 1" tape ?...particularly when they are providing the specification ?


With the USA manufactures being so heavily regulated, I'm afraid something like this will push a fine company like 3M to move to China; I want them to stay here.
 
Well, Shannow, in this case, in some warped "sauce for the goose" sense..this was a situation of socialized profits and privatized costs.

The misnomer of 1" didn't have any substandard aspect to it in terms of quality of material or performance. I sincerely doubt that the public even noted that it was 1" ..let alone depended upon it being 1" in the task assigned to it. Your brass tubes are required to be exactly as described (within tolerances) due to real dimensional demands. It's not quite in the same room as selling .94 gallons of 87 octane gas and calling it 1.0 gallons.


..but..
21.gif
 
you know how the can of 13oz of coffee claims its ground so finely it'll make a whole pounds' worth of brew?

Scotch could claim this stuff is extra sticky so it does an inch worth of holding.
grin2.gif
 
Originally Posted By: ToyotaNSaturn
A 2" x 4" wood plank is more like 1-7/8" x 3-7/8" We should sue the lumber companies, too.
actually the dimensions of a 2x4 are about 1 1/2 x 3 1/2
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom