All I can say is ... please don't tell me how to behave here. What's wrong with debating/arguing/discussing technical information here ... really? If you don't like what I post, then please skip over it or put me on ignore. If you have something constructive to add to any technical discussion, or want to "argue" your technical inputs with information that backs up you argued claims, then please do that and not try to be a moderator.![]()
Put me on ignore if you don't like what I post here on technical discussions, and mind your own business. Seriously.No…
Mi will tell you how to behave…
Because someone needs to remind you how you act…
And yes… you are argumentative… At times for no apparent good reason.
You make yourself appear to be an arrogant and pompous individual.
Which I don’t believe that is a good thing.
And for the record…
I think you add a lot of very good posts on here. And I think you are better than you make yourself appear on here.
Put me on ignore if you don't like what I post here on technical discussions, and mind your own business. Seriously.
I've been posting technical info here and "debating/arguing" (whatever you want to call it) about technical topics here for over 10 years ... I don't need to "think about" how I present technical info or how to debate about technical subjects. Might as well just make this site a Wiki page where nobody can debate technical subjects, or anything at all, because someone might not like how someone posts. If you don't like my posts, report it to the Mods. Hey, why'd you get banned? ... "I posted too much technical information on a chat board that talks about technical stuff".Both of these long technical threads about filter efficiency have pretty much been technical debates and not going into personal attacks - threads get locked, deleted and people warned and possibly banned when that goes too far as you know. You're a good guy too, but maybe think twice about going down a rabbit hole like this.
![]()
If you don't need to think twice, then I don't either. See how that works when someone tells you to do something like they're your parents, lol.I don’t need to think twice…
I still remember that Judas Priest post (that song pops into my head sometimes when I'm looking at filters at the stores, lol), and got a laugh that you found it so funny. You know I try to be funny on here when appropriate ... without some humor thrown in it wouldn't be as fun.I know where my heart is…
And it is not from a bad place…
I know how I get at times too. I certainly have struggled with how I present or say things at times.
I enjoy many, many of your posts. I have learned a lot from your really good posts on here.
You made me laugh big time on here about that one post where Judas Priest was brought up me and I think you linked the video to that song Breaking the Law by Judas Priest… That was amazingly funny.
I believe you are a good, good guy my friend.
If you don't need to think twice, then I don't either. See how that works when someone tells you to do something like they're your parents, lol.People do what they do here and everyone has a unique personality and posting style. If they go out of line and break the posting rules then that's a different situation.
LoL ... I still remember that Judas Priest post (that song pops into my head sometimes when I;m looking at filters at the stores, lol), and got a laugh that you found it so funny. You know I try to be funny on here when appropriate ... without some humor thrown in it wouldn't be as fun.
I do wonder if the 25 micron data on the website is more current than the 46 micron data on the spec sheets. Let us know how it goes contacting them!I should contact them, these specs are not listed on their website
I do wonder if the 25 micron data on the website is more current than the 46 micron data on the spec sheets. Let us know how it goes contacting them!
They will probably send you this.I sent them email, will see if they respond. I said that I bought PBL14610 and would like to know if its 99% @ 25 microns
Like I mentioned someplace, there not nearly the talk and dissection of air filter efficiency in the Air Filter forum like there is here about oil filters. You would think there would be more focus on that by members always throwing out the standard "the air filter is the most important filter". I've found that's it's even harder to find ISO 5506 efficiency specs on air filters, and then you have to see it they say the ISO test was done with fine or course test dust. When I bought a Fram Ultra air filter a few years ago, I had to email Fram to get the efficiency test details.Air filter filtration is the same way. A STP red high performance air filter is way, way more efficient than the standard STP air filter. So it would be best to get the higher per air filter for the same exact reason.
They will probably send you this.
As post 159 shows, their claimed ISO 4548-12 efficiency for the PBL3001 on the website and the official spec sheet efficiency do not match.Ok, They will then have to admit that information on Purolator website is wrong. If its true, its false advertising.
Like I mentioned someplace, there not nearly the talk and dissection of air filter efficiency in the Air Filter forum like there is here about oil filters. You would think there would be more focus on that by members always throwing out the standard "the air filter is the most important filter". I've found that's it's even harder to find ISO 5506 efficiency specs on air filters, and then you have to see it they say the ISO test was done with fine or course test dust. When I bought a Fram Ultra air filter a few years ago, I had to email Fram to get the efficiency test details.
Check out these videos. They test the Fram Endurance compared to the other Fram filters
This test is with the Purolator Boss
Purolator Boss wins because it can filter most particles while flowing with minimal restriction.
View attachment 224822
Not sure if these are really new members or the same people posting this?Posting the same garbage videos that have already been discussed in depth.