Fast-food strikes set for cities nationwide

Status
Not open for further replies.
Originally Posted By: eljefino
Originally Posted By: gofast182

So what happens to McDonald's Dollar Menu after this? You think there's enough margin in $1.00 cheeseburgers to support paying everyone so much for no added value to the company? Not a chance. So, Dumb and Dumber, shut the [censored] up and flip your burgers or go out and take an economics class, I don't want to have to pay more for your ignorance.


I'd start with macroeconomics to see where that money goes...

If entry level wages double then there's a lot more money floating around in the economy on "what poor people buy" and the costs will go up where there's labor involved. So the price of a trinket at walmart will go up to reflect the longshoremen, truck driver, and cashier on US soil but not the raw materials or chinese guy putting it together.

That dollar cheeseburger could easily cost $2 but the market will be there, break even.

But rents won't double. They'll go up "some" as roommates split up and try for their own places. Section 8 types will complain that now they can't find affordable housing on their stipend. But then we're collecting taxes on $16/hr and that's a higher bracket so it's more than 2x as much money.

I mention this not as sparring material but as the rule of unintended consequences. Disparities in wealth of the magnitude we see today rarely end well; we can shave off the top or bring up the bottom. I can understand not seeing past one's ledger book but if the money there is is sprinkled around more evenly I see mostly good things happening.

Also, it seems like about the peak of the economic cycle when FINALLY people get the stones to demand better wages. Seems like the cost of oil and everything else goes up but not wages... stagflation.

I see what you're trying to do here and there's some point to it but this stuff doesn't happen in a vacuum as it would need to for that to be the case. You can't assume that the businesses this would affect just have the money laying around to pay all of these people so much more, it has to come from somewhere, they have to earn it first. Most businesses don't run margins so high they can just soak that up. So they raise prices and you think they'll sell the same amount of goods and services? The people who didn't see such a massive wage increase may no longer be able to afford the same goods and services. You might have been better served by paying more attention to the first 3/4 of my anecdote.
 
Hey, my guys on commission get a minimum pay during slow season to help them out. I can't tell you how many times I have gotten ZERO pay while I pay them first!

Small biz is by far a larger job creator than even McDonalds. I wonder how many of our socially progressive folks here remember that we match every penny of taxes we take from those paychecks? That's right, WE PAY TOO.

And I totally believe big money owns our gov't. It's a simple fact that congressmen are cheap to a huge corporation!
 
Originally Posted By: xfactor9
Labor costs for even a small fastfood restaurant can run $175k. They think a restaurant with razor-thin margins can survive if those costs exploded to $350k?

The strikers are making their own bed. If they get their way, half of them should start looking for a new job. Whoever is organizing this strike is clueless




I agree with you overall thought.....

My only grippe with allot of posts here are that the big arches has no issue with "razor thin" profit margins. I am a share holder, I added this to my portfolio (due to there MAJOR add campaign and efforts to renovate there buildings and get them "upto speed")and forget about it for a year at a time and have been for two years. last fiscal year my shares gained 4-5$ total in the end, in 2012 revenues totaled over 20 billion WITH A "B" ! There revenue per employee is over 60K......

http://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/mcd

All that being said they should pay less !! Really in the end they work for the share holders. And when they got hired at said FAT food place, they agreed to low wages, no advancements and equally no moral reward. IT IS A STEPPING STONE JOB to get your feet wet in the job market UNTIL you better yourself and move on.

FRANKLY these guys that have 4 kids and are 30 and CHOOSE to go work at one of these establishments is a LOW LIFE with no self respect and the sad part is there children dont stand a chance !
 
If these protesters get their way and burger flippers start making $15 an hour, then I'm protesting my employer for higher pay...if a burger flipper is worth $15 an hour, then a skilled tradesman such as myself is certainly worth $60 an hour...
 
Business is about maximizing profits. If a fast food place could charge 20% more for a meal, it would already be doing that.

Should these folks get their pay raise, odds are they will cut their labor costs to maintain profitability, resulting in a zero net gain. The best, most productive workers will make $15/hour, and those who don't provide the same production per unit of pay will be making zero.

Those who don't offer skills and or a work ethic that is valued at the wage rate will be let go.

Many skilled people would apply to work for $15/hr, displacing those who can't make change, or don't show up on time, or other drama in the workplace.
 
But the employee count does not count those working in the restaurants. The restaurants are owned by a franchise holder. Since that is who will pay the wages to the fast food line worker, the margin there is far more meaningful than the corporate margin.

Originally Posted By: wsar10
Originally Posted By: xfactor9
Labor costs for even a small fastfood restaurant can run $175k. They think a restaurant with razor-thin margins can survive if those costs exploded to $350k?

The strikers are making their own bed. If they get their way, half of them should start looking for a new job. Whoever is organizing this strike is clueless




I agree with you overall thought.....

My only grippe with allot of posts here are that the big arches has no issue with "razor thin" profit margins. I am a share holder, I added this to my portfolio (due to there MAJOR add campaign and efforts to renovate there buildings and get them "upto speed")and forget about it for a year at a time and have been for two years. last fiscal year my shares gained 4-5$ total in the end, in 2012 revenues totaled over 20 billion WITH A "B" ! There revenue per employee is over 60K......

http://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/mcd

All that being said they should pay less !! Really in the end they work for the share holders. And when they got hired at said FAT food place, they agreed to low wages, no advancements and equally no moral reward. IT IS A STEPPING STONE JOB to get your feet wet in the job market UNTIL you better yourself and move on.

FRANKLY these guys that have 4 kids and are 30 and CHOOSE to go work at one of these establishments is a LOW LIFE with no self respect and the sad part is there children dont stand a chance !
 
Originally Posted By: javacontour
Business is about maximizing profits. If a fast food place could charge 20% more for a meal, it would already be doing that.

Should these folks get their pay raise, odds are they will cut their labor costs to maintain profitability, resulting in a zero net gain. The best, most productive workers will make $15/hour, and those who don't provide the same production per unit of pay will be making zero.

Those who don't offer skills and or a work ethic that is valued at the wage rate will be let go.

Many skilled people would apply to work for $15/hr, displacing those who can't make change, or don't show up on time, or other drama in the workplace.

That's a good point right there. At $15 an hour I can see thousands of intelligent, very capable, and skilled folks who already have a decent job deciding that as a good amount of extra income, working a few hours a day at a fast food joint would be a nice monthly financial supplement. So in reality, if this ever does happen, the sloths and lazy workers would soon be replaced by folks already proven and established in the workforce. The employer would have intelligent, older, and harder working folks gladly working part-time at $15 an hour....and the customer would benefit in FAR better service. Only issue? The price of the food would certainly rise (and interestingly enough, price out those very same sloths that wanted the $15 an hour to begin with). Lol...
 
See my prior post. Food costs really won't rise. If they could charge more now, they would.

Costs will be cut to keep the burger at a price the market will bear.

They may go up initially. But eventually, those whose skills and work ethic are not worth $15/hr will find themselves out of work.

Labor that's more productive, automation, or some combination will replace those whose skills and work ethic do not warrant $15/hr, keeping the burger close to it's current price.

Just look at cars. More and more labor has been taken out of the building of a car, while wages, until recently kept going up.

Cars, given that you get so much more, really have not increased in price relative to inflation.

Higher labor costs per unit labor usually means cutting the number of labor units needed to accomplish the task.
 
You are correct, $7.35 an hour is not enough to live on. No one ever, ever said it was. Working as a fry cook at McDs is not and will not be a career.

A business' profits do not belong to the employees of the business, if there are any they belong to the owner. You all need to get this fact straight and move on. Employees are paid a wage for a job and that wage is (should be) dictated by the marketplace. Higher skill requirements garner higher wages. The profitability of the business does not factor in most cases.

If it did then I could pay lower wages when I am less profitable. But the fact remains that the business owner or owners take the risk and own the profits.

"We" cannot raise the minimum wage to whatever we want because unlike the government WE do not print money. The last time I looked the Treasury Department isn't dropping of stacks of twenties at my door, only my customers are (one at a time BTW) in exchange for a product they feel is worth the expenditure. That is a really dumb statement.


Originally Posted By: ram_man
The fact of the matter is 7.35hr is not enough to live on. And instead of a company paying a living wage we have the company letting the govt (tax payers) Picking up the slack.
Mc donalds and all those huge corporations could pay 10-12 an hour and survive just fine. The companies are helping create a entitlement society.
If you work full time you should atleast make the poverty line. When the poverty line is 24, 000 annual and the income a minimum wage employee makes is roughly 14, 500 a year there is a problem. People are being worked and worked and arent even at the POVERTY LINE. My wife for example is a shift manager for a fast food company been there 4yrs and makes 8.25hr if she works over time its not worth the time and a half because she pays so much more in taxes.
But we can raise minimum wage to whatever we want, as long as the dollar isnt backed by anything and we keep just printing . The dollar will eventually be nothing more than toilet paper.
 
Shareholders should complain when CEOs of the companies of which they hold shares get such large packages.

If they are not providing value, then they shouldn't get paid, period.

Doesn't matter if you make $7.35/hr or 7.35 Million.

Originally Posted By: Trajan
Wonder how many here complain about CEOs who make millions even as their company goes under.
 
Originally Posted By: Trajan
Originally Posted By: xfactor9
Labor costs for even a small fast food restaurant can run $175k.


You of course have the ledgers to prove that?



Did you fail 5th grade arithmetic? An average fast food worker makes about 18K/year. 175K only nets about 9 fast food employees. Most fast food restaurants have far more than 9 employees.
 
Originally Posted By: javacontour
See my prior post. Food costs really won't rise. If they could charge more now, they would.

Costs will be cut to keep the burger at a price the market will bear.

They may go up initially. But eventually, those whose skills and work ethic are not worth $15/hr will find themselves out of work.

Labor that's more productive, automation, or some combination will replace those whose skills and work ethic do not warrant $15/hr, keeping the burger close to it's current price.

Just look at cars. More and more labor has been taken out of the building of a car, while wages, until recently kept going up.

Cars, given that you get so much more, really have not increased in price relative to inflation.

Higher labor costs per unit labor usually means cutting the number of labor units needed to accomplish the task.


Food cost won't really rise? Cost will be cut? They HAVE ALREADY cut cost on many things. There is hardly anything left to cut. Profit margins are already razor thin. And to say that food cost "won't really rise" shows you simply have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. A $6 burger meal suddenly becomes a $10-$12 meal overnight. I don't consider that an insignificant rise in food cost.
 
Fast food restaurants will follow the airline model of Ala-carte pricing.

Want ketchup? .25 cents a pack.
Napkin? .05 cents a piece.
Straw? .05 cents
Sauce for your nuggets? .30/piece
Want to sit in a booth? $1/rental fee
 
But it won't happen because folks will not pay that for a burger meal.

If a burger meal goes to $12, folks will go get a real meal for that kind of coin.

Costs will go down because they will have 1/2 the folks working. I.E. two workers at $7.50/hr or one, more productive worker at $!5/hr, doing the same work as the two $7.50/hr workers.

A burger meal is only worth so much, regardless what your labor costs are. So fast food places will adapt or die.

If they could get $12/meal today, wouldn't they be doing that already?

Originally Posted By: bubbatime
Originally Posted By: javacontour
See my prior post. Food costs really won't rise. If they could charge more now, they would.

Costs will be cut to keep the burger at a price the market will bear.

They may go up initially. But eventually, those whose skills and work ethic are not worth $15/hr will find themselves out of work.

Labor that's more productive, automation, or some combination will replace those whose skills and work ethic do not warrant $15/hr, keeping the burger close to it's current price.

Just look at cars. More and more labor has been taken out of the building of a car, while wages, until recently kept going up.

Cars, given that you get so much more, really have not increased in price relative to inflation.

Higher labor costs per unit labor usually means cutting the number of labor units needed to accomplish the task.


Food cost won't really rise? Cost will be cut? They HAVE ALREADY cut cost on many things. There is hardly anything left to cut. Profit margins are already razor thin. And to say that food cost "won't really rise" shows you simply have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. A $6 burger meal suddenly becomes a $10-$12 meal overnight. I don't consider that an insignificant rise in food cost.
 
Originally Posted By: javacontour
But it won't happen because folks will not pay that for a burger meal.

If a burger meal goes to $12, folks will go get a real meal for that kind of coin.


Absolutely true. Fast food joints will go out of business and these almost welfare protestors will be actual welfare cases.

Originally Posted By: javacontour
If they could get $12/meal today, wouldn't they be doing that already?


The market doesn't support it and it won't support it if wages go to $15/hour.
 
I was meaning to post and agree that a labor cost of $175K was very much on the low side. That's a small establishment.

Originally Posted By: bubbatime
Originally Posted By: Trajan
Originally Posted By: xfactor9
Labor costs for even a small fast food restaurant can run $175k.


You of course have the ledgers to prove that?



Did you fail 5th grade arithmetic? An average fast food worker makes about 18K/year. 175K only nets about 9 fast food employees. Most fast food restaurants have far more than 9 employees.
 
Originally Posted By: bubbatime
Fast food restaurants will follow the airline model of Ala-carte pricing.

Want ketchup? .25 cents a pack.
Napkin? .05 cents a piece.
Straw? .05 cents
Sauce for your nuggets? .30/piece
Want to sit in a booth? $1/rental fee


probably, some truck stops do some of this already

AND if I'm correct considering your name and location......
"PowerPig, hello I'm burnin !"
 
Originally Posted By: bubbatime
Originally Posted By: Trajan
Originally Posted By: xfactor9
Labor costs for even a small fast food restaurant can run $175k.


You of course have the ledgers to prove that?



Did you fail 5th grade arithmetic? An average fast food worker makes about 18K/year. 175K only nets about 9 fast food employees. Most fast food restaurants have far more than 9 employees.


Did you even get to the 5th grade? Again, let's see the books. Or is English too hard for you to understand?

I'm not interested in what you claim, but only what you can prove? And you have failed.

And boo freakin hoo. Don't complain about labor costs. You get what you pay for. Unmotivated, unhappy, workers who all you're doing is training them for something else.

Which means you can kiss all the money you invested in them goodbye, as you'll be doing it over and over.

High turnover is not good for your bottom line.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom