Exxon's Profits Up 10% First Quarter Best Ever

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Dec 16, 2002
Messages
6,817
Location
Huntington Beach, CA
Exxon's Profits Up 10%

First Quarter Best Ever For Oil Giant; Valero Energy's Earnings Surge 35%

By JOHN PORRETTO
Associated Press

April 27 2007

NEW YORK -- Oil giant Exxon Mobil Corp. kicked off 2007 with a 10 percent rise in profits, its best-ever first quarter, as higher margins on refining and chemical operations offset lower prices for crude oil and natural gas.

Exxon Mobil, the world's largest publicly traded oil company, said Thursday it earned $9.3 billion in the January-March period, beating Wall Street expectations, even as revenue slipped and fell well short of analysts' forecasts.

The Irving, Texas-based company was the third major oil company to issue an earnings report in as many days. BP PLC, Europe's second-largest oil company, on Tuesday reported a 17 percent drop in first-quarter earnings on lower oil prices and declining production. On Wednesday, ConocoPhillips said its first-quarter profits rose 7.7 percent as a result of asset sales that offset lower year-over-year commodity prices.

Also Thursday, Valero Energy Corp., the nation's largest independent oil refiner, said its first-quarter profits jumped 35 percent on the back of stronger gasoline and distillate margins.

The market price for crude oil was off more than $5 a barrel in the first quarter, compared with a year earlier. The comparable price for natural gas also was down.

Still, given the rise in gasoline prices at the pump in recent weeks, oil majors such as Exxon Mobil and BP were getting little sympathy from U.S. consumers for not earning as much as they could have if market prices for their products had been higher to start 2007.

"They're hurting me all the way around," Bill LoGerfo of Staten Island said Thursday as he paid $3.27 a gallon for premium unleaded to fill up his car at a BP station in Manhattan.

"I'm in the construction business, so it makes it more expensive to get materials shipped to me," LoGerfo said. "These prices really trickle down to the little guy."

In response to the new round of oil profits, Sen. Bob Casey, D-Pa., introduced legislation Thursday that he hopes will curtail rising gas prices. Casey's bill would impose a windfall profits tax and close certain tax loopholes for big oil companies and use the money for research into biofuels and other related projects.

Exxon Mobil's profits amounted to $1.62 a share, up from $8.4 billion, or $1.37 a share, a year earlier. Analysts polled by Thomson Financial were looking for a profit of $1.52 a share.

Revenue fell to $87.2 billion from $88.9 billion a year earlier, well below the $100 billion that analysts had forecast.

Last year, the company posted the largest annual profit by a U.S. company - $39.5 billion. That result topped the previous record, also by Exxon Mobil, of $36.13 billion, set in 2005.

Last month, Exxon Mobil said it will spend some of that money on more than 20 new global projects in the next three years, investments expected to add 1 million oil-equivalent barrels a day to its volumes at peak production.

The company said it spent $4.3 billion on capital and exploration projects in the first quarter and plans to spend roughly $20 billion this year on such projects.

"In the first quarter, Exxon Mobil continued to actively invest, bringing additional crude oil, finished products and natural gas to market," Chairman and Chief Executive Rex Tillerson said.

Exxon Mobil said earnings from its exploration and production arm fell to $6.04 billion from $6.38 billion a year earlier, primarily reflecting lower oil and natural gas prices and decreased demand for natural gas in Europe.

The company said oil production in the first three months of 2007 was slightly higher than a year earlier, helped in part by increased production from projects in West Africa, Russia and the Middle East. Natural gas production was off from last year, hampered by mature field declines and lower European demand related to weather.

On the refining and marketing side of the business, Exxon Mobil's earnings rose to $1.9 billion from $1.3 billion to start 2006, lifted by improved margins and more efficient refining operations.

San Antonio-based Valero's profits rose to a first-quarter record $1.14 billion, or $1.86 a share, from $848 million, or $1.32 a share, a year earlier. Analysts forecast $1.81 a share, according to Thomson Financial.

Revenue declined to $19.7 billion from $20.93 billion. Analysts were looking for $22.96 billion.
Copyright 2007 Associated Press
 
"Valero Energy's Earnings Surge 35%"

Refining costs energy. In a normal market, refiners should be suffering under the high cost of oil and energies to refine it. There must be some artificial restriction of refining capacity going on.
 
Quote:


In response to the new round of oil profits, Sen. Bob Casey, D-Pa., introduced legislation Thursday that he hopes will curtail rising gas prices. Casey's bill would impose a windfall profits tax and close certain tax loopholes for big oil companies and use the money for research into biofuels and other related projects.




Wow, increase taxes and spending, that will bring down oil prices.
smirk.gif
 
Quote:


Quote:


In response to the new round of oil profits, Sen. Bob Casey, D-Pa., introduced legislation Thursday that he hopes will curtail rising gas prices. Casey's bill would impose a windfall profits tax and close certain tax loopholes for big oil companies and use the money for research into biofuels and other related projects.




Wow, increase taxes and spending, that will bring down oil prices.
smirk.gif





I'm glad to see someone with the balls to do something w/oil companies raping the American middle class.
 
And we decry GM/Ford/Chrysler for not being able to make money despite perceived advantages.

Exxon set up their leases and exploration way ahead of time with plenty of foresight. I daresay longer than it takes to plan a new auto model run.

And let's not forget all the state-owned oil companies with closed books. That we can see the profits of a couple outfits that we can even buy stock in should not cause us to direct anger exclusively at those with reportable finances who were in the right place at the right time.
 
Quote:




I'm glad to see someone with the balls to do something w/oil companies raping the American middle class.




Please tell me how pandering to the masses = ballz

He's pandering to JoeSixpack for votes. I know you weren't driving in 1974 when we had gas lines. (Price low..no product) With retards like Casy we can hope to pay less for gas, demand goes up and supply goes down = gas lines. I'm from Pa. Casy is a retard. As a politician, he is below the norm in honesty and integrity (IM0) and that's saying a lot.

The masses here in this country don't seem to understand that there is no more gasoline to be had. We have all we can get. We can only get more if we pay above the spot market prices.
frown.gif
And that will hurt the dollar and inflation even more.

But as long as folks buy into Casy's #@$%!- its good for him.
 
Saw Boone Pickens on CNBC earlier this week. Said he expects to see global demand actually outstrip supply this year. A preview of peak oil maybe? So if wee see a national average of $4 gasoline this summer like many in the industry predict, that may seem like the good old days in the not so distant future.
 
Yes, Al. Like you've said, there's no shortage of petroleum products at the price we pay. There's a shortage of cheap petroleum.

Everyone should look at the pie chart view on this page. Not only will it give you some idea of the proportions that we're dealing with ..but it should give you a perspective on how out of whack most of us are in terms of personal standing compared to what we pay for in global output/demand.

Sure is a whole lot of tire spinning going on.
 
Quote:


Quote:


Quote:


In response to the new round of oil profits, Sen. Bob Casey, D-Pa., introduced legislation Thursday that he hopes will curtail rising gas prices. Casey's bill would impose a windfall profits tax and close certain tax loopholes for big oil companies and use the money for research into biofuels and other related projects.




Wow, increase taxes and spending, that will bring down oil prices.
smirk.gif





I'm glad to see someone with the balls to do something w/oil companies raping the American middle class.



With all due respect you could not be more wrong. A fraction of the cost of a gallon of gas is the oil/refining/delivery...far and away the majority of the cost the "middle class" is getting raped on is from TAXES. Local/Sate/Federal TAX makes up the majority of the cost of a gallon of gas. Refocus your anger.
 
Good, the CEO should get a 10% raise, he just made us the stock investors that much richer. Man o man my energy portfolio…
crazy.gif
ooo.gif
 
Al,
please consider the ultimate in supply and demand, the electricity grid.

You flick a switch, and the entire grid responds to meet that demand, turn it off, and it ceases. The whole thing takes milliseconds. There is no storage, and what is available on the day is absolutely what's there. Not a forecast, not traded in futures, just either there or not there.

Aluminium smelters use a lot of electricity, and they get it cheap, as they are bulk buyers, and prepared to be the first offloaded when it comes time for demand shedding.

Power is pre-bid, in (our case) 5 minute blocks. Obviously the price peaks at around the time that demand peaks...supply and demand.

However, when there is an unscheduled drop in capacity, the available supply becomes less than the demand.

Prices increase 400 times the average (not 400%, 400 times).

Who gets the profits ?

Not the smart providers.

ALL the providers get the benefit of the shortage.

As I've been typing, I tend to agree with you. We are nearing the end of a finite resource, and the price is going up.

Should that mean that profits for those able to access that resource should rise to record levels ?

Or does it mean that they are paying too little to the rest of the Earth dwellers to access that finite resource ?

If that money is enriching the shareholders, where is the capital coming from to replace that resource ?
 
Quote:


Quote:




I'm glad to see someone with the balls to do something w/oil companies raping the American middle class.




Please tell me how pandering to the masses = ballz

He's pandering to JoeSixpack for votes. I know you weren't driving in 1974 when we had gas lines. (Price low..no product) With retards like Casy we can hope to pay less for gas, demand goes up and supply goes down = gas lines. I'm from Pa. Casy is a retard. As a politician, he is below the norm in honesty and integrity (IM0) and that's saying a lot.

The masses here in this country don't seem to understand that there is no more gasoline to be had. We have all we can get. We can only get more if we pay above the spot market prices.
frown.gif
And that will hurt the dollar and inflation even more.

But as long as folks buy into Casy's #@$%!- its good for him.




I see Exxon has you conditioned already. Pay those ridiculous high prices, suck it up and don't mention anything about it. That's what they want. Gasoline should be regulated like a utility so these thieves can't do what they're doing. If wht you're saying is true, the oil companies can make any kind of artificial shortage they want and nobody should keep them in check. Just suck it up and pay those high prices. Higher CAFE standards are the most sensible solution to this "shortage" but I don't see them being raised either.
 
Buy Exxon stock. Do you have a life insurance policy? Pension plan? Mutual fund? They own Exxon stock.Exxon's dividends are pretty nice.
 
^^^I bet Exxon's dividends won't come close to making up the difference in what you're paying for gas. Their dividends would pay a little nicer if the CEO wouldn't have gotten his 400M last year. What a bunch of thieves.
 
As usual, the media concentrates on reporting "windfall profits" and ignores the "windfall" expenditures the oil industry has invested in exploring for new sources of crude, becoming able to drill deeper than ever before, learning how to pump new oil from old wells once thought dry, upgrading refineries to produce more product and meet the vast amount of federal regulations on enviromental issues, sulphur content, seasonal blends, etc. Imagine what the price of gas would be had the industry not found ways to find and refine more crude.

As for Sen. Bob Casey's bill? If anyone thinks the government is going to spend Exxon's money better than Exxon, dream on.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom