ExxonMobil - LSPI

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Nov 16, 2002
Messages
38,065
Location
NJ
Link

Quote:
BACKGROUND

[0004] Pre-ignition in a flame propagation (or "spark-ignition") engine describes an event wherein the air/fuel mixture in the cylinder ignites before the spark plug fires. Pre-ignition is initiated by an ignition source other than the spark, such as hot spots in the combustion chamber, a spark plug that runs too hot for the application, or carbonaceous deposits in the combustion chamber heated to incandescence by previous engine combustion events.

[0005] Many passenger car manufacturers have observed intermittent pre-ignition in their production turbocharged gasoline engines, particularly at low speeds and medium-to-high loads. At these elevated loads, pre-ignition usually results in severe engine knock that can damage the engine. The cause of the pre-ignition is not fully understood, and may in fact be attributed to multiple phenomena such as hot deposits within the combustion chamber, elevated levels of lubricant vapor entering from the PCV system, oil seepage past the turbocharger compressor seals or oil and/or fuel droplet auto-ignition during the compression stroke.

[0006] Pre-ignition can sharply increase combustion chamber temperatures and lead to rough engine operation or loss of performance. Traditional methods of eliminating pre-ignition include, for example, proper spark plug selection, proper fuel/air mixture adjustment, and periodic cleaning of the combustion chambers. Hardware solutions such as cooled exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) are known, but these can be costly to implement and present packaging problems.

[0007] Low speed pre-ignition (LSPI) is a type of abnormal combustion affecting engines operating at high brake mean effective pressure (BMEP) and low engine speed (RPM). This includes internal combustion engines using a variety of fuels, including natural gas, gasoline, diesel, biofuels, and the like. Downsized, downspeeded, turbocharged engines are most susceptible to operating under these engine conditions and are thus more susceptible to LSPI. As the automobile industry continues to move towards further downsizing, downspeeding, and increased turbocharging to increase vehicle fuel economy and reduce carbon dioxide emissions, the concern over LSPI continues to grow.

[0008] The further development of downspeeded, turbocharged gasoline engines is being impeded by LSPI. A solution to this problem or even a mitigation of its occurrence would remove barriers for original equipment manufacturer (OEM) technology and efficiency improvement. A lubricant formulation solution would enable product differentiation with regard to LSPI.

[0009] Although pre-ignition problems can be and are being resolved by optimization of internal engine components and by the use of new component technology such as electronic controls, modification of the lubricating oil compositions used to lubricate such engines is desirable. For example, it would be desirable develop new lubricating oil formulations which are particularly useful in internal combustion engines and, when used in internal combustion engines, will prevent or minimize the pre-ignition problems. It is desired that the lubricating oil composition be useful in lubricating gasoline-fueled, spark-ignited engines.

[0010] Despite the advances in lubricant oil formulation technology, there exists a need for an engine oil lubricant that effectively prevents or reduces low speed pre-ignition especially for downsized, downspeeded, turbocharged engines.




Quote:
As sulfated ash is known to be detrimental to LSPI performance, the fact that doubling the sulfated ash going from 0.8 weight percent to 1.6 weight percent unexpectedly leads to a very minimal increase in LSPI count, from 0 to 2, reiterates the novel findings represented by these blends, even at extremely high ash level. Examples 4 and 5 show LSPI reductions of 100% and 95%, respectively.
 
Interesting.

and also:

http://fuelsandlubes.com/digital/fli/2013-Q3/files/assets/basic-html/page43.html

Calcium showed the most dominating effects on LSPI frequency as increased calcium detergent raised LSPI frequency, Hirano said. In fact, the impact was so strong that raising the percentage of Ca from 0.1 to 0.2% increased LSPI frequency by a factor of three. However, further increase to 0.3% had an insignificant effect on LSPI frequency. Molybdenum and phosphorus on the other hand, showed good suppression abilities as the LSPI frequency decreased when these elements were increased. At values of 0.07% and 0.15% by mass of MoDTC and ZnDTP respectively, LSPI disappeared. The contribution of Phenolic AO was not found to have any significant effect on LSPI frequency in any manner. The tests also confirmed the substantial decrease in LSPI frequency without the detergent. Experiments were conducted on GF-5 oils and two samples were compared, with and without detergent, which showed that in the case of the sample without detergent, the LSPI frequency was substantially lower than the oil sample with detergent.
 
thumbsup2.gif
cheers3.gif
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top