Dino is going the way of the Dinos.
Entry LOL the little API sticker is your friend!
What is wrong with GP III. Does PAO have a higher film strength?Just my view… it is the base oil. Every since group 3 hydrocracked became legal it has been considered the lesser synthetic.
Thanks for asking, I am not an oil expert. What little I know PAO base oil has a higher viscosity index, wider temperature range including a lower pour point. Also PAO has low points, more expensive and actually lower lubricity. Not an oil brain but Group III is one thing in my mind and Group III+ is another. Since you are smarter than me on this would you consider Mobil’s Visom and SK’s Yubase Group III or Group III+?What is wrong with GP III. Does PAO have a higher film strength?
Shelf space. The more products, the more shelf space. The more shelf space, the more likely the consumer is to take notice of those bright yellow Pennzoil bottles (which is why they transitioned all their products into yellow bottles a couple of years ago and got away from Yellow, Bronze and Silver). In the drug store the other day I looked at Excedrin Migraine and Excedrin Extra Strength. Two different items but with the exact same active ingredients right down to the mg's of each. To my eye, no difference at all. But, with two different products and two shelf slots, the consumer may be more likely to see Excedrin and less likely to see something else. Of course, once they create different products, now they have to differentiate them from one another. I always thought the terminology "Entry Level" on Pennzoil Full Synthetic was not a good way to go because it really makes it sound like a lesser product than the Platinum lineup. Perhaps "Traditional" synthetic since it seems to be a Group III crude-based product as opposed to GTL-based?I honestly don't see the point in these oil companies making an entry level synth.
Excedrine Migraine works like a charm! I tend to get migraines sometimes due to allergies. I always keep it unhand.Shelf space. The more products, the more shelf space. The more shelf space, the more likely the consumer is to take notice of those bright yellow Pennzoil bottles (which is why they transitioned all their products into yellow bottles a couple of years ago and got away from Yellow, Bronze and Silver). In the drug store the other day I looked at Excedrin Migraine and Excedrin Extra Strength. Two different items but with the exact same active ingredients right down to the mg's of each. To my eye, no difference at all. But, with two different products and two shelf slots, the consumer may be more likely to see Excedrin and less likely to see something else. Of course, once they create different products, now they have to differentiate them from one another. I always thought the terminology "Entry Level" on Pennzoil Full Synthetic was not a good way to go because it really makes it sound like a lesser product than the Platinum lineup. Perhaps "Traditional" synthetic since it seems to be a Group III crude-based product as opposed to GTL-based?
uh, no. Most prefer the 458 to the 488 as the 458 is naturally aspirated. Better noise, throttle response, and power curve from NA engines.Entry level API sticker lol.
It's like a Ferrari versus a Turbo Ferrari. "Which one is better" well, the Turbo Ferrari should be faster.. but both Ferraris, right?
I frequent BITOG and I find a lot of it confusing . I guess it helps if you really give a **** .I think all the marketing crap that goes along with all the different levels of oils makes it confusing to the average person that doesn't frequent BITOG.
What is wrong with GP III. Does PAO have a higher film strength?
If it was a food product maybe, otherwise it ain't going to happen unless someone blended a pricey, true PAO/ POE synthetic and wished to advertise it as such for market advantage.It would sure be nice if the oil bottles were to give breakdown - even if it was just to the groups: group III 60%, group IV 30%, etc.. Sure most consumers wouldn't know much about it at first, but they would probably google or join this site and learn. It would help cut through some of the marketing spin. Overall I think it would help them sell more synthetic oil because perception would increase the notion that conventional oil is "bad" oil.
Yes but that’s not really what defines the performance of the finished product. The approvals, specifications and licenses do that. And even between oils with the same approval or license it’s not a fait accompli that the one with 6% more PAO will perform better. For that you can only go by what the blender tells you.It would sure be nice if the oil bottles were to give breakdown - even if it was just to the groups: group III 60%, group IV 30%, etc.. Sure most consumers wouldn't know much about it at first, but they would probably google or join this site and learn. It would help cut through some of the marketing spin. Overall I think it would help them sell more synthetic oil because perception would increase the notion that conventional oil is "bad" oil.