"concerned with the high VI of these oils with their minimal use of VIIs"
That doesn't make any sense. Obviously a 0w-30 will contain more VII's than the same oil in a 10w-30. So if you're concered with minimizing their use, why wouldn't you choose the latter, or better yet a straight 30?
It seems like you wrote the article after you decided what product you thought would work best. If these cars are designed to use a straight 30 oil, what has changed that a 0w-30 is now such an obvious choice that a several page article would come to the conclusion that it's the only recommendation? I'm all for technological advancements finding their way into older applications, but I'm completely unconvinced that a 0w-30 is any better than Dino 5/10w-30 a classic car that isn't started in below-freezing weather.
"Even though 5W-30 is more available in stores, I now have accounts with Esso and PetroCanada..."
Nice, ok, it makes sense now...