From what I can tell, the new Ecore version of the AC Delco PF53 ($4) is identical to the Valucraft V3614 ($2).
The new Ecore filter media is different from the old AC Delco PF53 media, in form, thickness, and number of pleats. Pleat depth is about the same.
These three filters were disassembled and compared as shown (hopefully) in the following images. I have no idea if the observations listed here are signifigant to filter performance.
Here from left to right, disassembled, are the Old AC PF53, the new AC PF53 (Ecore), and the Valucraft V3614 (Ecore).
The clearance between the metal end caps and the casing of the old style AC is about 0.080" all around.
The clearance between the fiber end disks and the casing of the new Ecore design averages about 0.04" all around. The numbers and letters are my markings. The numbers 43 and 74 are the number of pleats counted in each filter.
Approximate thickness of the old style AC PF53 filter media is around 0.013" and is ribbed or corrugated.
Approximate thickness of the new Ecore AC PF53 filter media is around 0.018" and is mostly flat.
Approximate thickness of the Ecore Valucraft filter media is around 0.018" and appears identical to the AC.
The Ecore filter media seems to be only adheared on edge to the fiber end disks. The flexible end disks are relatively easy to peal away from the media by hand.
For comparison, a Fram of a different size is shown here with approx 1/16" deep fillet of potting sealing the filter media to the fiber end disks.
For comparison the bond on this Fram is somewhat stronger than the end seal of the Ecore, but can still be torn away by hand. The potting in the old style AC Delco, with metal end caps, could not be torn by hand.
By the way, Champion FAXed me their data sheet on Ecore listing the single and multi pass efficiency.
Single pass 10-20 micron (SAE HS-806) = 96%
Multiple pass 20 micron (SAE J1858) = 94%
Champion's name for the filter media for both tests is "9668".
Again, I have no idea if the observations listed here are signifigant to filter performance. Just sharing observations.
The new Ecore filter media is different from the old AC Delco PF53 media, in form, thickness, and number of pleats. Pleat depth is about the same.
These three filters were disassembled and compared as shown (hopefully) in the following images. I have no idea if the observations listed here are signifigant to filter performance.
Here from left to right, disassembled, are the Old AC PF53, the new AC PF53 (Ecore), and the Valucraft V3614 (Ecore).
The clearance between the metal end caps and the casing of the old style AC is about 0.080" all around.
The clearance between the fiber end disks and the casing of the new Ecore design averages about 0.04" all around. The numbers and letters are my markings. The numbers 43 and 74 are the number of pleats counted in each filter.
Approximate thickness of the old style AC PF53 filter media is around 0.013" and is ribbed or corrugated.
Approximate thickness of the new Ecore AC PF53 filter media is around 0.018" and is mostly flat.
Approximate thickness of the Ecore Valucraft filter media is around 0.018" and appears identical to the AC.
The Ecore filter media seems to be only adheared on edge to the fiber end disks. The flexible end disks are relatively easy to peal away from the media by hand.
For comparison, a Fram of a different size is shown here with approx 1/16" deep fillet of potting sealing the filter media to the fiber end disks.
For comparison the bond on this Fram is somewhat stronger than the end seal of the Ecore, but can still be torn away by hand. The potting in the old style AC Delco, with metal end caps, could not be torn by hand.
By the way, Champion FAXed me their data sheet on Ecore listing the single and multi pass efficiency.
Single pass 10-20 micron (SAE HS-806) = 96%
Multiple pass 20 micron (SAE J1858) = 94%
Champion's name for the filter media for both tests is "9668".
Again, I have no idea if the observations listed here are signifigant to filter performance. Just sharing observations.