Originally Posted By: CELICA_XX
Please tell me in which jurisdiction you are legally protected to GO OUTSIDE WITH A FIREARM and blast someone for stealing property.
Property crime alone never justifies lethal force.
You are WRONG!
Also if more thieves were killed in their commissions of their robberies you can BET that those crime rates would PLUMMET. If you are committing felonies such as grand theft auto you deserve to be killed for it. The reason why I say this is that almost ALWAYS criminals will escalate the level of their activities and eventually they end up harming innocent victims in the process.
1. Texas: Deadly Force In Defense Of Personal Property.
Texas is different. In Texas, one can use deadly force not just to protect a person, but also to protect personal property, including to “retrieve stolen property at night,” during “criminal mischief in the nighttime” and even to prevent someone who is fleeing immediately after a theft during the night or a burglary or robbery, so long as the individual “reasonably” thinks the property cannot be protected by other means..
Please tell me in which jurisdiction you are legally protected to GO OUTSIDE WITH A FIREARM and blast someone for stealing property.
Property crime alone never justifies lethal force.
You are WRONG!
Also if more thieves were killed in their commissions of their robberies you can BET that those crime rates would PLUMMET. If you are committing felonies such as grand theft auto you deserve to be killed for it. The reason why I say this is that almost ALWAYS criminals will escalate the level of their activities and eventually they end up harming innocent victims in the process.
1. Texas: Deadly Force In Defense Of Personal Property.
Texas is different. In Texas, one can use deadly force not just to protect a person, but also to protect personal property, including to “retrieve stolen property at night,” during “criminal mischief in the nighttime” and even to prevent someone who is fleeing immediately after a theft during the night or a burglary or robbery, so long as the individual “reasonably” thinks the property cannot be protected by other means..
Last edited: