Originally Posted By: DriveHard
Originally Posted By: Ducked
Originally Posted By: DriveHard
The CCEFP and Iowa State University did a study on this. The results are pretty straight forward. Using a magnet does help increase filter efficiency on both ferrous and non-ferrous materials.
Interesting. I wouldn't describe the non-ferrous bit as "pretty straight forward." I'd say it was fairly surprising. Can't tell from the slides how significant it is, though.
I suppose it might be explained by some adhesion or entrainment of the non-ferrous materials with the ferrous, though I didn't notice a specific explanation in the slides.
They could test the effect of introducing non-ferrous particles to the experimental filtration test mix, but I think the non-ferrous result was a test on an operating hydraulic, as opposed to a model, system.
That is what slides 10-12 are trying to describe. My understanding is the natural attractive forces "cohesion" between small particles is what captures the non-ferrous particles. They have already "stuck" together with a ferrous particle, and then the ferrous particle gets trapped by the magnetic field...taking the non-ferrous particle with it. I have a meeting with Dr. Steward on a different topic next week...I will try to gain clarification. If you have any specific questions, please let me know and I will try to pass them along.
Perhaps ask about that "old wives tale" above? (Re-entrainment of magnetised particles).
I doubt its a very big deal, and it will depend on the specific design of the trap, but the one under study is in a high flow area and doesn't appear to have any specific arrangement to sequester trapped particles, (as seen in the "Magnom" device at the bottom of slide 4), so I wonder if its a concern at all.
Originally Posted By: Ducked
Originally Posted By: DriveHard
The CCEFP and Iowa State University did a study on this. The results are pretty straight forward. Using a magnet does help increase filter efficiency on both ferrous and non-ferrous materials.
Interesting. I wouldn't describe the non-ferrous bit as "pretty straight forward." I'd say it was fairly surprising. Can't tell from the slides how significant it is, though.
I suppose it might be explained by some adhesion or entrainment of the non-ferrous materials with the ferrous, though I didn't notice a specific explanation in the slides.
They could test the effect of introducing non-ferrous particles to the experimental filtration test mix, but I think the non-ferrous result was a test on an operating hydraulic, as opposed to a model, system.
That is what slides 10-12 are trying to describe. My understanding is the natural attractive forces "cohesion" between small particles is what captures the non-ferrous particles. They have already "stuck" together with a ferrous particle, and then the ferrous particle gets trapped by the magnetic field...taking the non-ferrous particle with it. I have a meeting with Dr. Steward on a different topic next week...I will try to gain clarification. If you have any specific questions, please let me know and I will try to pass them along.
Perhaps ask about that "old wives tale" above? (Re-entrainment of magnetised particles).
I doubt its a very big deal, and it will depend on the specific design of the trap, but the one under study is in a high flow area and doesn't appear to have any specific arrangement to sequester trapped particles, (as seen in the "Magnom" device at the bottom of slide 4), so I wonder if its a concern at all.