Dirt in Oil vs Wear

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Jan 9, 2005
Messages
1,691
Location
Sarasota, Florida
It seems that the amount of dust inhaled by our engines has far more adverse effects than the brand of oil and oil viscosity. Where is the dirt acting within the engine causing wear? Is it everywhere, just the rings/cylinders, what? Are there any papers showing this relationship or explaining where in the engine ingested dirt has effects?

The wear seems to be viscosity independent. Why? If you use a thick oil maybe there should be no wear - after all, it is still filtered, just not as well with some lesser air filters.

Maybe the thinner oils should allow more wear based on this but it does not seem to be the case.

Oil filters seem to be relatively less important in this regard. Why?

aehaas
 
Last edited:
Just a guess here, but I would think most wear would occur in cylinders due to the minimal hydrodynamic conditions there. This makes for a greater amount of mixed/boundary conditions giving more chance for contact.
There is also the possible "erosion" effect similar to sand in water polishing/eroding stone.
 
Which brings up the idea of frequent oil changes{3,000 miles?} may actually be the best thing you can do to prolong engine life and maintain good compression as new performance???

What good does using top quality oils/fancy filters for extended drains, if the buildup of microscopic dirt circulating through the engine is what causes wear? Might as well use basic oil/filter and change frequently??? Maybe Jiffy-Lube was right all along with their 3 month/3,000 mile slogan???
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom