Diesels have doubled in hp.

Joined
Nov 29, 2009
Messages
9,513
How come were pushing 400hp out of blocks we used to only push 160-200ish. Remember the Ole 7.3 powerstroke? The 5.9 cummins was 215hp in 1999. Now it's like 400hp in the 6.7 version which is just a 5.9 bored put more. Does this have any effect on engine lifespan compare to the same engines with less hp?
 
How come were pushing 400hp out of blocks we used to only push 160-200ish. Remember the Ole 7.3 powerstroke? The 5.9 cummins was 215hp in 1999. Now it's like 400hp in the 6.7 version which is just a 5.9 bored put more. Does this have any effect on engine lifespan compare to the same engines with less hp?
Advancements in fuel injection. As for reliability I think that depends on what individual parts you consider as being part of the engine. Fuel injectors may not be as reliable and a failed injector can spin a bearing in no time.
 
Higher fuel injection and boost pressures, coupled with DOHC design. But even older diesels could be tuned to make more power than stock. You'd have more smoke if you overfueled, unless you added more air. Up to a point you could easily extract 20-40 more hp and quite a bit more torque. After that, it got expensive with bigger pumps, injector nozzles, hybrid turbos, exhaust upgrades, etc.

FWIW, my GLK Bluetec is a 2.1L 4-pot and cranks out 201hp and 369 lbs-ft torque. It can (and has) made more while tuned, but it's back to stock now.

My previous X3 diesel 2.0L 4-pot made 180hp in stock form, but was easily tuned to 250hp and 450 lbs-ft torque. It was quite the unsuspecting monster. Alas, I needed a bigger vehicle and went with a new RAM 1500 diesel with the 3.0L DOHC making 265hp. The time will come for its tune as well, I have other priorities at the moment...
 
A tuner will push an 03+ 5.9 past 400hp with stock parts. I'm not discussing reliability etc, but today's numbers while they sound impressive is really just tinkering with the same formula while balancing extremely complicated emission systems.
 
I rented a 2024 Chevy 2500HD with the duramax for my last PA trip. The torque ... I can definitely see why people get addicted to the diesel torque. I couldn't get in the throttle enough to make the thing kick down because it would immediately hit the limit of my trailer tires.

It would pull the steepest hills at 1200 RPM just idling along.

Whatever the reasons, any desire for me to own a pickup with a diesel has been crushed by the recent history of diesels and the diesels currently available in that space.
I have a friend who worked at a dealer. I've heard too much about how much they cost to fix. NO THANKS!
 
Yes the higher output shortens the life of the engine. How many people will put 600,000 miles on the diesel pickup?
 
GM 3.0 DURAMAX seems to have a positive rep....so far.
What is the point of that engine?

Ford had a little 3.0 for a while.
It was easily out performed by the V6 EcoBoost.

My '17 Eco puts out 375hp and 420tq on regular pump gas.
It can get 21+ mpg.
It has lower maintenance and fuel cost.
 
Back
Top Bottom