Well, not exactly, but given what I'm trying in it, that seemed too good a thread title to pass up.
I am defying BMW's viscosity recommendations, since according to the OM, a 10W-40 is too thin for current ambient temperatures as well as those we'll see over the next few months.
I've done seven runs of FAR Nextgen Maxlife in this engine, and had a very nice UOA of the third run.
I decided to try FAR Defy.
I'll do three runs of it and UOA the third. The car will be run under similar conditions, so the results should be pretty comparable.
It'll also be intersting to see whether traces of sodium from the Valvoline still remain after 4K+3K+4K on Defy.
Also, I'll get to see whether I've been sucessful in diagnosing and reducing the fuel dilution I saw in the Maxlife UOA.
Finally, this will be instructive in any discussion of which HM is better, at least in this engine as I use it.
I am defying BMW's viscosity recommendations, since according to the OM, a 10W-40 is too thin for current ambient temperatures as well as those we'll see over the next few months.
I've done seven runs of FAR Nextgen Maxlife in this engine, and had a very nice UOA of the third run.
I decided to try FAR Defy.
I'll do three runs of it and UOA the third. The car will be run under similar conditions, so the results should be pretty comparable.
It'll also be intersting to see whether traces of sodium from the Valvoline still remain after 4K+3K+4K on Defy.
Also, I'll get to see whether I've been sucessful in diagnosing and reducing the fuel dilution I saw in the Maxlife UOA.
Finally, this will be instructive in any discussion of which HM is better, at least in this engine as I use it.