- Joined
- Sep 28, 2002
- Messages
- 39,799
Well, I wanted a spin on bypass filter ...sparky fixed me up (great guy). Bought the dual guard ..a full flow and a bypass (gotta love the BE-110). Upon closer examination ...I noticed, "Hey, these Cummins thread are only Cummins on the outside (the part you screw the filter on to) ..the "screw in" part is the SAME as my Permacool Ford style dual mount ...which I already had plumbed. So ...out spins the Ford threads ..in go the Amsoil threads and viola~! Easy switch.
But....
Now I looked at that fine Dual-Guard mount ..all that beef ..all that fit and finish....so regal ..so substantial ....it asks no forgiveness ..and offers no apoligies....
..and all I could fit on it is standard full flow Ford size filters since these inserts are now in my Permacool
Amsoil doesn't appear to have these fittings available seperately. In fact, if you have a Cummins and want a dual mount..you get a Dual Guard and not the mount with the biasing valve (or so the web site and tech support confirms).
So ..I sit there and debate on trying to get these fittings machined ...knowing the hassle and the expense is probably not going to be worth it...
BUT WAIT!!!! I believe that I'm saved!!! A newbie "alloy" quotes some ridiculously low price for a remote (single) mount, right off the Amsoil website, for $14.95 that fits the bypass filter. I scoff,"Surely you're mistaken. You "may" get a filter for $14.95 ..but a mount?
Well, sure enough ..alloy confirmed this with a live person and, yes, there is indeed a $14.95 mount available for the Cummins threaded Amsoil bypass filters. I said, "YA-HOO!! I'm home free. For the mere cost of $29 I can have two of these fittings to put in my Dual Guard!".
Sure ..this was way expensive for just two threaded fittings ..but what the heck
? I doubt that I could get them machined for any less (maybe ..but).
So .....
I wait with anticipation for my single (and discontinued) mount to arrive. I get home ..see the box (the excitment is growing in me as I slit the taped edges) ..and there it is ...the single moun!!!!!
I sit back and say "Now I can die a happy man"
BUT WAIT!!!!!
So ..I pickup the mount and attempt to remove the insert. I go get a pare of channel locks ...use a piece of thin rubber (one of those "jar lid grippers) and remove it. This was so I could insert it in the Dual Guard (I really only need ONE - I can put a Ford filer on my Permacool mount as the full flow.
Guess what? On the new mounts, Amsoil uses a 1x16 thread on the filter side ..and 3/4x16 on the mount side ...BUT THE OLDER SINGLE MOUNT IS 1X16 on BOTH ENDS!!!!!!
Engineered road blocks. I wonder how much more they would make in filter sales if they either make the bypass filters in Ford threads ..or made the inserts available to fit in Ford style Permacool mounts.
"All that I asked you to do is kill Superman ..and you can't do that one simple thing for me"
Oh ..one other interesting note. The single antiquated mount has a brass bolt internally threaded into the threaded insert. That is, you basically have a piece of 1 x 16 threaed pipe with a plug in it (outlet for the filter). I thought it was some type of intallations tool that was accidentally left in there. On closer inspection (REAL CLOSE) ...it has what must be about a 0.010 hole drilled in it ..but the Dual Guard inserts have no such "exit restrictor" on them.
Anyone have a clue why this older mount choked the outlet side of the flow and the newer ones appear to have no need for this restriction? One could ponder that they desired to relieve the stress of high pressure differentials to spare the media from collaspe.
..but that offers the question ...
What about now
[ May 20, 2004, 12:36 AM: Message edited by: Gary Allan ]
But....
Now I looked at that fine Dual-Guard mount ..all that beef ..all that fit and finish....so regal ..so substantial ....it asks no forgiveness ..and offers no apoligies....
..and all I could fit on it is standard full flow Ford size filters since these inserts are now in my Permacool
Amsoil doesn't appear to have these fittings available seperately. In fact, if you have a Cummins and want a dual mount..you get a Dual Guard and not the mount with the biasing valve (or so the web site and tech support confirms).
So ..I sit there and debate on trying to get these fittings machined ...knowing the hassle and the expense is probably not going to be worth it...
BUT WAIT!!!! I believe that I'm saved!!! A newbie "alloy" quotes some ridiculously low price for a remote (single) mount, right off the Amsoil website, for $14.95 that fits the bypass filter. I scoff,"Surely you're mistaken. You "may" get a filter for $14.95 ..but a mount?
Sure ..this was way expensive for just two threaded fittings ..but what the heck
So .....
I wait with anticipation for my single (and discontinued) mount to arrive. I get home ..see the box (the excitment is growing in me as I slit the taped edges) ..and there it is ...the single moun!!!!!
I sit back and say "Now I can die a happy man"
BUT WAIT!!!!!
So ..I pickup the mount and attempt to remove the insert. I go get a pare of channel locks ...use a piece of thin rubber (one of those "jar lid grippers) and remove it. This was so I could insert it in the Dual Guard (I really only need ONE - I can put a Ford filer on my Permacool mount as the full flow.
Guess what? On the new mounts, Amsoil uses a 1x16 thread on the filter side ..and 3/4x16 on the mount side ...BUT THE OLDER SINGLE MOUNT IS 1X16 on BOTH ENDS!!!!!!
Engineered road blocks. I wonder how much more they would make in filter sales if they either make the bypass filters in Ford threads ..or made the inserts available to fit in Ford style Permacool mounts.
"All that I asked you to do is kill Superman ..and you can't do that one simple thing for me"
Oh ..one other interesting note. The single antiquated mount has a brass bolt internally threaded into the threaded insert. That is, you basically have a piece of 1 x 16 threaed pipe with a plug in it (outlet for the filter). I thought it was some type of intallations tool that was accidentally left in there. On closer inspection (REAL CLOSE) ...it has what must be about a 0.010 hole drilled in it ..but the Dual Guard inserts have no such "exit restrictor" on them.
Anyone have a clue why this older mount choked the outlet side of the flow and the newer ones appear to have no need for this restriction? One could ponder that they desired to relieve the stress of high pressure differentials to spare the media from collaspe.
..but that offers the question ...
What about now
[ May 20, 2004, 12:36 AM: Message edited by: Gary Allan ]