quote:
Best at filter dirt is AC-delco.
only in one application in one test.
The results could well switch around amongst the paper filters when applied to another vehicle.
re K&N's making more power, I've posted before that in a few back to back tests we did 9 or so years ago, we made more power with a K&N over foam racing filters,(UNI Filter, Piper Cross) and even bettered the no air filter runs, both when using, and not using ram tubes with a full return radius on them on a Formula Ford 1600.
The K&N had to be mounted in a non-standard way to achieve this, but it was a repeatable 1.5-2 horsepower, which could equate to as much as a 1/10 of a second on the track, sometimes the difference 'tween first and third on the grid.
We could only put it down to the air being straightened by the filter and wire gauze as it entered the little Weber's venturi. Whatever was happening, it worked.
Would this happen on an injected vehicle ? I doubt it, but air flow is a funny thing, and the only way to know for sure is testing.
I spent a small fortune on a K&N for my Land Rover, (IIRC, AU$186.00, made in the UK) then pulled it after 20,000km and replaced with a Donaldson element after a few reports from South Africa with vehicles running the same 300Tdi engine in similar conditions (lots of dirt/gravel roads) suffering excessive upper cylinder wear and using a K&N. Twelve months later Spicers report emerged, and so I didn't feel so bad about having an expensive paper weight sitting here.