My truck has a 305ci engine which, according to the Haynes Service manual should have cylinder compression of 150psi.
I tested the compression on all 8 cylinders back a few months ago. All 8 of them registered between 165-175 psi. This engine has about 180k miles on it.
To the best of my knowledge, higher than normal compression on a stock engine might indicate a build-up of carbon on the piston rings. The engine has been run a strict diet of Mobil 1 10w30 and 5w30 all its life. The top of the engine is pretty spotless but, of course, I have no way of knowing the condition of anything else without tearing it down.
I'm not looking to "fix" anything because the engine runs beautifully, has plenty of power, gets excellent gas mileage, doesn't smoke, doesn't burn oil, and the plugs always look great.
Higher than normal compression would lead me to believe that I would be experiencing issues using regular 87-octane fuel, like pre-detonation or something along those lines, yet I don't have that problem.
So, what's the real story behind it all? Is the Service Manual just incorrect?
I tested the compression on all 8 cylinders back a few months ago. All 8 of them registered between 165-175 psi. This engine has about 180k miles on it.
To the best of my knowledge, higher than normal compression on a stock engine might indicate a build-up of carbon on the piston rings. The engine has been run a strict diet of Mobil 1 10w30 and 5w30 all its life. The top of the engine is pretty spotless but, of course, I have no way of knowing the condition of anything else without tearing it down.
I'm not looking to "fix" anything because the engine runs beautifully, has plenty of power, gets excellent gas mileage, doesn't smoke, doesn't burn oil, and the plugs always look great.
Higher than normal compression would lead me to believe that I would be experiencing issues using regular 87-octane fuel, like pre-detonation or something along those lines, yet I don't have that problem.
So, what's the real story behind it all? Is the Service Manual just incorrect?