- Joined
- Dec 30, 2006
- Messages
- 29,558
Weird as all these cars seem huge to me. When I think of compact cars. I think of Pintos, Chevettes, etc.
Nice choice. Mine would be the Dart with the 440 Magnum. Automatic was the only transmission available, and few options could be had. They were built to run in SS/EA, so they were kept pretty basic.I’ll take the 69 Nova with the L78 396 box checked, along with the Muncie M22, and 411 posi please…and in Marina blue….sure…add the console and gauge package…and the am/fm eight track….! I’ll figure out how to make the $93 a month payments later.![]()
I know, right!Weird as all these cars seem huge to me. When I think of compact cars. I think of Pintos, Chevettes, etc.
What you don't see is the tq these things had. The 225 slant 6 in a valiant or whatever had 215 ft lbs of tq. And all available at about 1200 rpm! My dad's 68 valiant moved out very well and could squeek the tires with it's 2.7 rear end ratio. Cars today make their power at much higher rpm. Often 3x that rpm.Most of those cars had between 90-115hp. All were surely heavy.
I’d have to imagine if that power level in modern engine tech (maybe better, diesel or compression gasoline engines), modern cars…. We would have much better fuel economy figures. To some extent you need what you need. Wind resistance is cubic to power, and people, even enviro greenies, think they’re entitled to drive obscene speeds. But smaller power plants pushing bigger cars, not engines that are smaller but tuned to give huge power numbers, could be ideal for a lot of use. Too many are trained to think they can’t merge on the highway or drive safely without a v6 and hundreds of hp. And it bites them all the way to the bank.
It was 2/3rds of the 6I never knew the Nova came with a 4cyl. I always thought a 6cyl.
We’ve basically moved back to that with modern engines. Pentastar v6 makes 90+% of peak torque starting at 1800rpm.What you don't see is the tq these things had. The 225 slant 6 in a valiant or whatever had 215 ft lbs of tq. And all available at about 1200 rpm! My dad's 68 valiant moved out very well and could squeek the tires with it's 2.7 rear end ratio. Cars today make their power at much higher rpm. Often 3x that rpm.
I never knew the Nova came with a 4cyl. I always thought a 6cyl.
Just a few years ago, I sold my ‘69 Nova. Before Rock Auto was available, getting parts at the local auto store was interesting because some parts men would insist that it was a Nova, others would insist it was a Chevy II. Anyway, my car had the four cylinder/power glide combo. Factory manual choke, no power anything, drum brakes all the way around and AM-only radio. I won a bet with that car, though. I bet a co-worker that I could change the fuel pump, from start to finish, in five minutes. Plenty of time to spare. Best mileage I got was 22 mpg.I never knew the Nova came with a 4cyl. I always thought a 6cyl.
have a pal who owned 1 road worthy & 1 not-so-road-worthy 360. While he did some body work in his shop,The 66mpg 1969 Subaru 360 was available back then in limited numbers
I mentioned "SCAMP" but I believe it was a "VALIANT". That sounds' bout right.My girlfriend at that time had two '69 Dart/Scamp(at the same time) w/Slant 6's. One car was refrigerator white and the other was pea soup green. I can't remember which was which but the green one had green interior and the white one had like a charcoal-ish interior, IIRC!
The only compact cars we had in our family at that time were...well, I don't think we did have anything smaller than a BUICK or CHRYSLER.
VW owned the micros in the '60s. The Japanese imports were just starting to squeeze through a crack in the door. My uncle bought a Carolla around 1967. Compared to contemporary competition, it was pretty basic and crude.I know, right!
But those cars didn't arrive til the 70's
You were right, a Scamp is a Valiant.I mentioned "SCAMP" but I believe it was a "VALIANT". That sounds' bout right.
Man, it's been a long time!![]()