Originally Posted By: lovcom
In the last 20 years, our family has owned no less then 8 Chrysler products, and every single one had major problems with reliability before 50,000 miles.
Chrysler makes the worse cars sold in America. Even the Korean makes do better. Chrysler is long past their supremacy of the 1960's and before that. Today, and relatively speaking, Chrysler makes junk. The only ones that can't face this are those that own Chrysler products, because to face this fact means admitting they chose the dummy brand. Time and time again, when compared to same category other makes, Chrysler has the worse MPG, the worse reliability, the worse dependability, and the worse resale value.
I find it exceedingly funny that someone will think Chryslers are good because they had a good experience with their one or few Chrysler products, while ignoring the massive millions that would say otherwise.
And now Chrysler wants to merge with Europe's 'Chrysler" Fiat...two losers team together to lose even bigger....
As I posted a few pages back I'm on my second Chrysler vehicle that I bought new, I've owned several before them that I bought used and none have given me major trouble.
I was an ASE certified master auto tech and I used to fix cars everyday for a living and I've worked on just about every brand. I am still a mechanic but working on transport vehicles of a different type. I quit working on cars because I'd rather get paid more for doing less, you could say I'm lazy. On my days off the last place I want to be is under the hood of a car. Now why would I, a mechanic who doesn't like to work on his own car, buy a Chrysler?
In the last 20 years, our family has owned no less then 8 Chrysler products, and every single one had major problems with reliability before 50,000 miles.
Chrysler makes the worse cars sold in America. Even the Korean makes do better. Chrysler is long past their supremacy of the 1960's and before that. Today, and relatively speaking, Chrysler makes junk. The only ones that can't face this are those that own Chrysler products, because to face this fact means admitting they chose the dummy brand. Time and time again, when compared to same category other makes, Chrysler has the worse MPG, the worse reliability, the worse dependability, and the worse resale value.
I find it exceedingly funny that someone will think Chryslers are good because they had a good experience with their one or few Chrysler products, while ignoring the massive millions that would say otherwise.
And now Chrysler wants to merge with Europe's 'Chrysler" Fiat...two losers team together to lose even bigger....
As I posted a few pages back I'm on my second Chrysler vehicle that I bought new, I've owned several before them that I bought used and none have given me major trouble.
I was an ASE certified master auto tech and I used to fix cars everyday for a living and I've worked on just about every brand. I am still a mechanic but working on transport vehicles of a different type. I quit working on cars because I'd rather get paid more for doing less, you could say I'm lazy. On my days off the last place I want to be is under the hood of a car. Now why would I, a mechanic who doesn't like to work on his own car, buy a Chrysler?
