Originally Posted By: Vikas
The math does not lie as long as your assumptions are reasonable and reflect the real world. For example, if the mileage vs tread depth graph is not linear but rather exponential (or asymptotic), then the wear will no longer be the same.
Now you might ask why the graph would be non-linear? It could be by the design e.g. different gradation of tire compound on the surface. Or it could be because as tire wears out, it rotates faster for the same amount of mileage which causes it to wear out even more.
Doesn't matter.
After any even number of rotations, each individual tire will have been run an equal amount of time on both front and rear axles.
Doesn't matter what the relative wear rates are front to back, or whether the wear rate is linear or non-linear, it all adds up to the same amount of wear.
Where you run into problems is when you do not maintain the same mileage between rotations, then tires will spend an unequal amount of time on front and rear resulting in uneven wear.
The math does not lie as long as your assumptions are reasonable and reflect the real world. For example, if the mileage vs tread depth graph is not linear but rather exponential (or asymptotic), then the wear will no longer be the same.
Now you might ask why the graph would be non-linear? It could be by the design e.g. different gradation of tire compound on the surface. Or it could be because as tire wears out, it rotates faster for the same amount of mileage which causes it to wear out even more.
Doesn't matter.
After any even number of rotations, each individual tire will have been run an equal amount of time on both front and rear axles.
Doesn't matter what the relative wear rates are front to back, or whether the wear rate is linear or non-linear, it all adds up to the same amount of wear.
Where you run into problems is when you do not maintain the same mileage between rotations, then tires will spend an unequal amount of time on front and rear resulting in uneven wear.
