Castrol Syntec 10W30 Mitsu Montero 3.8L V6 7614 Mi Fram X2 Particle Count

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Apr 7, 2005
Messages
1,904
Location
Bay Area, CA
OK. I call this the Anti-Bitog oil test. I used the Evil Castrol Syntec 10W30 oil with the Evil Fram X2 (Extended Gaurd) oil filter (full synthetic element). The truck is a mixture of a grocery getter, kid mobile, mixed with some fairly long trips.

A couple of observations.

Look at those low Iron and Copper numbers for the Castrol. I know it is common for Castrol to show lower numbers than Mobil, but it is shocking to see such a dramatic change on your own engine.

My Silicon number is nice and low and I still have the original air filter. When I inspect it, it looks fine. Just slightly darkened. The filter is about 2.5 years old. I don't see any reason to change it.

Where is that Nickel coming from?

Particle count is OK. I was interested because this is a full synthetic element. The numbers are not nearly as good as the recent M1 EP particle count. Insulubles are higher than they were with my last K&N filter.

I have Penzoil Platinum in now, because it was cheap with the Pepboys rebate.


code:

This Last Universal

Sample Sample Averages

(CS 10W30) (M1 5W30)

Mi/Oil 7614 6580

Mi/Unit 26,180 18,636

Make-Up Oil 0.5 0.5

Aluminum 3 5 5

Chromium 1 2 1

Iron 5 15 13

Copper 1 4 6

Lead 2 2 4

Tin 0 1 1

Moly 71 69 44

Nickel 4 3 1

Manganese 0 0 0

Silver 0 0 0

Titanium 0 0 0

Potassium 1 1 1

Boron 33 80 55

Silicon 8 7 10

Sodium 5 8 10

Calcium 2726 2582 2078

Magnesium 14 16 137

Phosphorus 691 864 804

Zinc 810 1010 943

Barium 0 0 1



==========





Test : Vis Flash Fuel AFZ H2O INSOL

@210F Deg F % % % %

.

Shd Be: 58-65 >365


This: 62.4 395
Sampl



last: 60.7 390
Sampl



.

This TBN = 2.8

Last TBN = 2.2

PARTICLE COUNTS



ISO Code: 17/13



Size of Particle Count



>=2 microns 1969

>=5 microns 729

>=10 microns 202

>=15microns 78

>=25microns 18

>=50microns 1

>=100microns 0


Blackstone Comments:
You added about 1000 miles to your oil change for this sample, and most wear improved. That's a very good sign that your Mitsubishi engine has no problems to speak of, and that you're treating it well. The TBN read 2.8, still showing some (not a lot) active additive left in the oil. The particle count read 17/13, clean for an engine oil. The number of particles present >=2 micron: 1969. >=5: 729. >=10: 202. >=15: 78. >=25: 18. >=50: 1. >=100: 0. We think your oil filtration system is working well and the oil could be run longer next time. Try 8000 miles.
 
I agree with Pablo. Nickel would be from an alloy. If I had to bet money on one of my guesses I would guess its coming from the camshaft. The nickel reading is low. I would be more concerned about a tin reading then nickel.
 
quote:

Particle count is OK. I was interested because this is a full synthetic element. The numbers are not nearly as good as the recent M1 EP particle count. Insulubles are higher than they were with my last K&N filter.

Winston can you list out more info about particle count you got with other oil / filter / mileage combinations? Did you use M1 EP oil with K&N filter combo. on your last run?
Very intersting. Thanks for spending the bucks to do the particle count.
 
Oops forgot to put in the dates.

The old Mobil 1 sample date was May 12, 2005. The oil was in about 8 months old. The latest sample was taken on Feb. 1, 2006. So that is about 8.5 months.

As far as the last filter (K&N) I did not do a particle count. The last oil was the regular M1, not the EP. I think it was SL. The M1 EP particle count that I was referring to was done by someone else on a different engine. So, it does not compare directly, but I think it still is usefull data.

Here is a thread with a bunch of particle counts.

Particle Count Thread
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top