Bring a Trailer is Dangerous

You'd really rather have this tricked out piece of expensive trouble than a TF?
This is one of the few cases in which one could say that an MG TF would be the more practical car as well as classier.
I’ve owned two Austin Healey 3000s. One a 1962 triple carb BT7, the other a 1963 BJ7. Beautiful and timeless. I was never an MG fan.

Scott
 
There's always time to learn to do better :ROFLMAO:
Would my V12 Jaguar E-type count? I had one of those too, a 4-speed manual. In truth, I ended up hating that car and sold it after 10 years of angst. My wife Sue helped me pull the engine and transmission in one gigantic lump when I put a new clutch in it. That thing was a difficult car to work on. But there’s nothing like the wail of a V12 at WOT while going 142 mph!

Scott
 
No, the V-12 E-type was an abomination with a comically long nose.
I still wish I had bought one when they were still quite affordable.
I've always had a thing for the TF and also the MGA.
My far more modern MGB was also a fun car to dive and was easily maintainable and repairable, except for the clutch.
Truth to tell I've always liked the big Healeys. They have such a cool vintage look to them and plenty of power by the standards of the time as well.
 
Wow, even though it's the hated 996 and it has what most would consider high miles for a Porsche as well as seven past owners, that is beater money for a nicely kept car.
It has had the IMS work done and it has had a clutch replacement (only two grand?).
This car would be a pretty compelling case for buying a Porsche even with the little problems that it has.
What do you think?
 
Wow, even though it's the hated 996 and it has what most would consider high miles for a Porsche as well as seven past owners, that is beater money for a nicely kept car.
It has had the IMS work done and it has had a clutch replacement (only two grand?).
This car would be a pretty compelling case for buying a Porsche even with the little problems that it has.
What do you think?
Depends on what it sells for. I'd say that for ~$10k, buy it and enjoy the ride.

It's a 3.4 so you don't have to really concern yourself with D chunk or bore scoring, and the IMS and clutch were done.

Not a lot of "gotchas" there. Multiple owners, over 100k miles, and light damage on the Carfax... That's a driver. The value isn't going to go down unless you total it. 🤣
 
No, the V-12 E-type was an abomination with a comically long nose.
I still wish I had bought one when they were still quite affordable.
I've always had a thing for the TF and also the MGA.
My far more modern MGB was also a fun car to dive and was easily maintainable and repairable, except for the clutch.
Truth to tell I've always liked the big Healeys. They have such a cool vintage look to them and plenty of power by the standards of the time as well.
I've had five English cars; the two Healey 3000s and the E-type I mentioned earlier, plus two Triumph TR6s. My second TR was pretty much a street legal race car. I was crewing for a national championship caliber SCCA race car team in the early and mid '70s. I was responsible for all the suspension setups, including spring selection, shock valving, alignment settings, plus I maintained everything brake related. I even experimented with tire stagger, which was unheard of in the series back then. I had connections with the British Leyland Competition department, which was in nearby Brisbane, CA. Anyway, the Jag being the exception; the Healeys and TRs were EXCEPTIONALLY reliable.

I had two close friends with MGs; one had two MGAs (one a twin cam) and the other a "B" (as they were called back then). Their cars were exceptionally reliable as well.

We used to drive our "British Iron", just to drive them and put miles on them - the exception being the E-type. The problem with that car was the Opus ignition system as well as its sheer mechanical complexity, which made it incredibly time consuming to work on.

Scott
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom