Now it’s 3.1% of folks between 1 million and 5 million and 0.1% of Americans over $5 million.
We all should know our goal
We all should know our goal
A Roth is fine. However I have this feeling they will come looking to tax those some day when tax revenues are short. Maybe my tinfoil hat is too tight. A Roth 401K is subjected to the same limits as a deferred one. I was responding to someone that wanted $80K to be the 401K limit. I suppose $80K to a Roth would be OK, tinfoil hat not withstanding. However at that point it truly would be a loophole for the rich.I know you weren't replying to me but think of those limits and they could be Roth contributions too. Like I said in a previous post, my plan is 415(c) limited. The plan design allows for standard 401k contributions to be Roth, and then after the limit, after tax contributions that sweep to a backdoor Roth.
Is that $5M liquid or 401K or total assets?Now it’s 3.1% of folks between 1 million and 5 million and 0.1% of Americans over $5 million.
We all should know our goal
Do you mean low 6 figures? Low 7 and saving like mad sounds fine to me.These are some scary numbers. I recently hit my 50’s, wife 40’s and between our Canadian RRSP and TFSA (similar to 401(k) and Roth IRA) we are low 7 figures and feel we are way behind and saving like mad.
I can't imagine ever rolling SS back. For starters there is only $2.7T in the trust fund, and they paid out $1.3T last year. Its the definition of a ponzi - current workers pay for retired workers, just like they did when they were working. So take the younger workers out and it implodes. Also, how to you tell someone that is 49 you paid in for 30 years, but as of now you won't get anything.Your reasoning here was exactly why I asked the questions I did… if all non-C-suite employees were to have unlimited yearly contributions, the potential to fuel stock prices would be even higher, which would benefit the C-suiters & billionaires alike.
Then on the backside, govt reaps the ongoing windfalls of Roth tax collections now, and normal 401k tax collections in the future. This plan would also allow the “sunset” of SS for those under say 50, and return more freedom and responsibility to people.
Do you mean low 6 figures? Low 7 and saving like mad sounds fine to me.
Liquidatable relatively rapidly ie not real property not total assets. Cash. Stocks. Bonds. Funds.Is that $5M liquid or 401K or total assets?
Asking for a friend...
Here's some numbers I just picked up off the 'net. Dunno if they are accurate. I just thing the top level numbers do not tell the story.
Net Worth = Assets - Liabilities.
View attachment 251289
I was agreeing with you. My point was currently, the law allows contributions over the 401k limit up $69k in 2024 (combined employee and employer contributions) and was using my plan's setup as an example of the loophole it creates, because of after tax dollars being used after the 401k contribution limit is hit automatically being swept as a backdoor roth contribution (in my plans case). Not sure I can see a justification to funnel that much tax advantaged dollars...A Roth is fine. However I have this feeling they will come looking to tax those some day when tax revenues are short. Maybe my tinfoil hat is too tight. A Roth 401K is subjected to the same limits as a deferred one. I was responding to someone that wanted $80K to be the 401K limit. I suppose $80K to a Roth would be OK, tinfoil hat not withstanding. However at that point it truly would be a loophole for the rich.
My point was that if you have gobs of cash your not going to spend, you probably want to talk to an estate planner because a tax deferred account like a 401K may not be the best way to move as much as possible to your heirs.
Weird number... Does it include liabilities?Liquidatable relatively rapidly ie not real property not total assets. Cash. Stocks. Bonds. Funds.
No. Not liabilities.Weird number... Does it include liabilities?
I guess I'm saying it doesn't tell me too much.
Not a big deal, but without context it is difficult to assign meaning.
Same here. I finally jumped on several years ago, but I held off on Roth's because I have a sneaking suspicion that when it comes time for me to get the benefit of getting my money back, tax-free, there will be some "golly, we hate to do this but we're going to have to change the rules going forward" rational to squeeze more money out of us....FWIW I have your same tin foil hat thought/concern. Wondering if one day everything over $X in a roth will be subject to something extra.
Liquidatable relatively rapidly ie not real property not total assets. Cash. Stocks. Bonds. Funds.
Same here. I finally jumped on several years ago, but I held off on Roth's because I have a sneaking suspicion that when it comes time for me to get the benefit of getting my money back, tax-free, there will be some "golly, we hate to do this but we're going to have to change the rules going forward" rational to squeeze more money out of us.
C’mon man - I mean comrade - you act like it’s your money …IRS will have some kind of distribution ’fee’ for Roth IRAs in the future….
![]()
![]()
What you have in a 401K doesn't necessarily reflect what you are doing for retirement. I had very little cash saved. I was buying rental properties...
I've been contributing 10% into my 401k since 1985, and it's grown into a decent nest egg. Had to buy "the ex" out of her share, and that hurt, but it's all good. My biggest regret, is moving my money too much over the years. I tell my kid to slam 100% into an S&P index fund and don't touch it. There will be dips, but it will come back...always.
I have the exact same amount as you in a 401K, $0.00. I guess we're both screwed...........No. Not liabilities.
Why do you need to assign meaning in a thread about how much someone has in a 401K? It's just a number and probably tells you very little as well.
I mean you know how much I have in a 401K? $0.00
In fact every retired person I know in this state has rolled their 401K's into SD IRA's. Zero point to keep $ in a 401K.
I have a doctor friend who drives Hondas and Hyundai’s. He won’t drive luxury cars here because salt does not discriminate between Honda and Mercedes. He lives in a nice, but modest home as well. He does have some nice kayaks and a canoe.Good to see lots of BITOG members are taking retirement very seriously and planning for their future.
Long time ago I knew someone driving a 10 year old Mercedes and was only putting $15 per paycheck ($390 yearly) towards his 401K. LOL
I told him to get rid of Mercedes cause it was causing him problems and expensive to repair, he said you only live once and he couldn’t drive a Corolla or Civic.
True story that I’ll never forget.