AVBLEND®

Status
Not open for further replies.
I used it along with the Phillips X/C 20W-50 in this 1974 Cessna 150.


74150ext-1-1.jpg
 
I owned it for five years. Sold it last year due to some medical reasons and the FAA would not issue me a new medical. Have since corrected the medical condition and am in the process of getting a new medical so I can fly again. But I will probably never be able to afford another plane again.
 
All I know is that it is a highly refined mineral oil but I do not know the process they use, or what else they might do to it. I do know that as an identifier, they put hospital grade ether in it.
 
Well, I know why the ether was put in back in 1951. Back then as well as now there were some dishonest mechanics around and at one particular dealer the mechanics were taking the product out of 5-gallon pails for their own use and substituting it with kerosene. When this was discovered Joe Lencki said he could fix that so he started adding a very small amount of hospital grade ether to it to give it a very distinctive odor when opened. The smell does go away in a very short time, but there is no mistaken what it is when you first open the container and pour it in.

As for as what it does, it does what it's claimed to do. I am copying and pasting from a post I made on the zMAX-Testing-FTC thread.

I received an email from Maurice Le Pera whom I've mentioned above several times. Mr. Le Pera has been reading BITOG and asked me to post the following in hopes it would help answer some of the questions. So, here it is exactly as written by him.

Comments on the BITOG Postings
October 14, 2010

A number of recent postings on the BITOG have raised questions regarding zMAX that focus on the (1) absence of any statistical analysis for the laboratory friction and wear testing that was performed, (2) the process of converting mineral oil into zMAX, and (3) the penetration mechanism. Prior to commenting on these questions, a brief clarification on the document zMAX Micro-Lubricant - The Facts that was posted is warranted. This document in no way was intended to be viewed or considered as a technical publication. It was merely generated to list all the testing that had been completed with zMAX as a means to inform potential zMAX customers. No more, no less.

Absence of any statistical analysis for the laboratory friction and wear testing. Although the listing of different tests reflects only a single test result for each ASTM method that was listed, there were actually repeat determinations but with different preconditioning periods, a three-day verses a fourteen-day exposure to alternate heating followed by cooling for each of the metal specimens used in the friction and wear test devices. These preconditioning periods, utilized for both the without zMAX as well as the with zMAX, were intended to reflect some of the operating environment within the engine. Since the fourteen day exposure produced the greater effect, it was used in the document. However in all instances, the same trends were evidenced (i.e., lower wear, etc.). All the friction and wear testing was performed by Savant Inc in Midland MI with Ted Selby in charge of the testing. In each of his reports, he noted “singular bench tests provide information and direction, but it is helpful and desirable to use multiple tests to establish limits of interpretation.” Multiple testing was not viewed as essential considering the results being obtained from the L-38/Sequence VIII single cylinder engine tests which all were showing significant reductions in wear. Additionally, the prior experience with AVBLEND in aircraft engines further confirmed the wear reduction qualities of this material. However, for the TEOST MHT-4 Thermo-Oxidation Engine Oil. Simulation Test (ASTM D7097), Ted Selby recommended strongly that multiple testing be performed. In this instance, five determinations were performed which confirmed the statistical significance of the obtained results.

The process of converting mineral oil into zMAX. As noted previously, the process wherein pharmaceutical grade mineral is converted to zMAX is proprietary. What is known is that this process converts a portion of the branched and cyclic hydrocarbons into linear hydrocarbons. This change before and after conversion was confirmed by Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectroscopy that was performed by Triton Analytics in Austin TX.

The penetration mechanism. Data generated from the laboratory tests has shown that zMAX does have an exceptional wetting quality (i.e., how easily a liquid will spread out on a surface and whether it has a strong affinity for the surface) due to its lower Surface Tension. Surface Tension is the surface energy between a liquid and a metal surface. It is this wetting quality that enables zMAX to be able to migrate both horizontally and vertically which explains how zMAX can adsorb onto and absorb into the engine metallurgy.

The ease at which zMAX is able to migrate (i.e., move) and penetrate the minute pores, cracks, and fissures is probably a function of not only its wetting qualities, but also the molecular structure of zMAX’s reformed hydrocarbons. The proprietary reforming process, in which mineral oil is subjected to prior to becoming zMAX, results in a change in the hydrocarbon composition, more normal paraffinic hydrocarbons (i.e., long chained hydrocarbons) than iso-paraffinic hydrocarbons (i.e., branched and cyclic hydrocarbons). This shift more than likely enables higher concentrations of the more linearly configured hydrocarbons to penetrate due to their having significantly less molecular hindrance (i.e., blockage). Ultimately, the ability of zMAX to penetrate into the metal substrate (i.e., beneath the surface) was more than demonstrated in the experiments involving the use of Auger Electron Spectroscopy. Moreover this penetration of zMAX is clearly evidenced in observing how pistons taken from engines after cleaning that had been exposed to zMAX will generate an oily film on the surface when left exposed to the atmosphere. This process of releasing absorbed oil is called deliquesce. Another easy related to example of this deliquesce process is how cheese will generate oil droplets if left exposed to room temperature conditions.
 
Well, that was the "claim" the FTC made, but all of the ASTM/SAE testing that was presented proved that nonsense charge wrong.

I am going to be sending you a PM sometime next week with the names and numbers of two folks that are in your profession, and you might even recognize their names when you see them. I am just waiting on final approval from the two individuals before I do. They will be able to tell you everything you might want to know about the product and their experience with it.
 
Quote:
The ease at which zMAX is able to migrate (i.e., move) and penetrate the minute pores, cracks, and fissures is probably a function of not only its wetting qualities, but also the molecular structure of zMAX’s reformed hydrocarbons. The proprietary reforming process, in which mineral oil is subjected to prior to becoming zMAX, results in a change in the hydrocarbon composition, more normal paraffinic hydrocarbons (i.e., long chained hydrocarbons) than iso-paraffinic hydrocarbons (i.e., branched and cyclic hydrocarbons). This shift more than likely enables higher concentrations of the more linearly configured hydrocarbons to penetrate due to their having significantly less molecular hindrance (i.e., blockage). Ultimately, the ability of zMAX to penetrate into the metal substrate (i.e., beneath the surface) was more than demonstrated in the experiments involving the use of Auger Electron Spectroscopy. Moreover this penetration of zMAX is clearly evidenced in observing how pistons taken from engines after cleaning that had been exposed to zMAX will generate an oily film on the surface when left exposed to the atmosphere. This process of releasing absorbed oil is called deliquesce. Another easy related to example of this deliquesce process is how cheese will generate oil droplets if left exposed to room temperature conditions.


The only instance I know of the "deliquesce" process is Scotts "Anytime" grass fertilizer in which the pellets gradually dissolve due to the absorbing of moisture from the air. The salts in the fertilizer absorb moisture from the air.

I am not sure the term "deliquesce" is properly used in this context or explanation.

From a physio-chemistry standpoint, a process whereby one substance of a higher concentration penetrates or migrates into or out of another substance is properly called, "diffusion," something the writer of this explanation should have known.

It appears that if any transforming of pharmaceutical grade white oil is being done here, it is to create a surfactant or spreading agent which simply reduces surface tension. A spreading of a liquid horizontally is possible with a surfactant, but not vertically.

And any transformation must have been done with a catalyst, which is not mentioned in this blurb.

I still see no data or evidence of a true molecular diffusion process going on here.
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: MolaKule

The only instance I know of the "deliquesce" process is Scotts "Anytime" grass fertilizer....


Reading their marketing material also made me think of fertilizer, but for a different reason.
smile.gif
 
Originally Posted By: MolaKule
Quote:
The ease at which zMAX is able to migrate (i.e., move) and penetrate the minute pores, cracks, and fissures is probably a function of not only its wetting qualities, but also the molecular structure of zMAX’s reformed hydrocarbons. The proprietary reforming process, in which mineral oil is subjected to prior to becoming zMAX, results in a change in the hydrocarbon composition, more normal paraffinic hydrocarbons (i.e., long chained hydrocarbons) than iso-paraffinic hydrocarbons (i.e., branched and cyclic hydrocarbons). This shift more than likely enables higher concentrations of the more linearly configured hydrocarbons to penetrate due to their having significantly less molecular hindrance (i.e., blockage). Ultimately, the ability of zMAX to penetrate into the metal substrate (i.e., beneath the surface) was more than demonstrated in the experiments involving the use of Auger Electron Spectroscopy. Moreover this penetration of zMAX is clearly evidenced in observing how pistons taken from engines after cleaning that had been exposed to zMAX will generate an oily film on the surface when left exposed to the atmosphere. This process of releasing absorbed oil is called deliquesce. Another easy related to example of this deliquesce process is how cheese will generate oil droplets if left exposed to room temperature conditions.


The only instance I know of the "deliquesce" process is Scotts "Anytime" grass fertilizer in which the pellets gradually dissolve due to the absorbing of moisture from the air. The salts in the fertilizer absorb moisture from the air.

I am not sure the term "deliquesce" is properly used in this context or explanation.

From a physio-chemistry standpoint, a process whereby one substance of a higher concentration penetrates or migrates into or out of another substance is properly called, "diffusion," something the writer of this explanation should have known.

It appears that if any transforming of pharmaceutical grade white oil is being done here, it is to create a surfactant or spreading agent which simply reduces surface tension. A spreading of a liquid horizontally is possible with a surfactant, but not vertically.

And any transformation must have been done with a catalyst, which is not mentioned in this blurb.

I still see no data or evidence of a true molecular diffusion process going on here.


I received an email from Mr. Le Pera this morning in answer to the above. Below is his comments copied and pasted from the email he sent me.

In response to the statements made by MolaKule of BITOG, the following is offered -

Comment--“I am not sure the term "deliquesce" is properly used in this context or explanation. From a physio-chemistry standpoint, a process whereby one substance of a higher concentration penetrates or migrates into or out of another substance is properly called, "diffusion," something the writer of this explanation should have known.”
Response--MolaKule is absolutely correct here as I unfortunately selected the wrong word to describe the adsorption and absorption of zMAX.

Comment--“It appears that if any transforming of pharmaceutical grade white oil is being done here, it is to create a surfactant or spreading agent which simply reduces surface tension. A spreading of a liquid horizontally is possible with a surfactant, but not vertically.”
Response--I am not completely sure that he is correct as I always thought that spreading or wetting could be two dimensional. A quick Google search on the terms "Wetting – Horizontal or Vertical" generated two references. Dynamics of Wetting Fronts in Porous Media, http://math.lanl.gov/~dmt/papers/mitkov.pdf and Experimental Validation and Applications of a Fluid Infiltration Model, http://superfund.berkeley.edu/pdf/295.pdf
Both of these papers are well above my level of understanding and are not really relevant to the issue of what zMAX does. However, they both mention vertical wetting and the second paper refers to horizontal spreading by capillary forces and vertical spreading by gravity and capillarity. One other point that gives further evidence that some migration of zMAX has vertically penetrated is the Auger Electron Spectorscopy measurements.

Comment--And any transformation must have been done with a catalyst, which is not mentioned in this blurb.
Response--The entire process used by Oil-Chem Research Corp. as stated many times is a proprietary process.

Comment--I still see no data or evidence of a true molecular diffusion process going on here.
Response—Perhaps not on the molecular level, but the Auger Electron Spectorscopy measurements certainly do indicate that there has been some diffusion of the zMAX material.
 
The respondant did present some interesting papers of which I read, but neither paper addresses my questions directly. Both papers dealt with porous media, not a tightly bonded crystalline material like iron or steel.
21.gif


I had no difficulty with the concept of horizontal spreading.
grin.gif


My question had to do with the proof that vertical migration or diffusion in the "Z" axis (vertical direction of metal penetration) by the liquid molecules could happen in a non-porous material such as a metal.

This topic piqued my interest since I had done research on the gaseous diffusion of (nuclear) alpha radiation products (helium nuclei) through crystalline materials such as natural and synthetic glasses.
20.gif


In the case of nuclei diffusion, the very small nuclei particle has to bounce around through the crystal lattice like a ball carrier trying to get through the defensive line; not easy, but possible. And it takes a concentration of material on one side to get through to the other side.

In the case of an organic molecule, liquid diffusion of these much larger entities is much more difficult, especially through a close-packed lattice of ferrous particles.

Johnny gave me contact information for the authors so I may contact them for a further discussion.
 
BTW, I know this is nitpicking, but the Manhattan Project's Scientific Director was J Robert Oppenheimer.

Enrico Fermi led the Metallurgical Laboratory under Stagg Field in Chicago.

Quote:
In Chicago, he [Joe Lencki] met Manhattan Project director Enrico Fermi and he perfected his zMAX formula.


I read nowhere in Enrico Fermi's or any else's Manhattan Project memoirs about Fermi helping Lencki or anyone else develop a lubricant, as this statement implies.

I strongly advise that sentence 2 of paragraph three be deleted, as this is patently inaccurate.

http://www.zmax.com/our_company/formula/
 
Also,
from

http://www.zmax.com/documents/maurice_lepera_expert_analysis.pdf


Quote:


...Comparative tests of zMAX by itself and in blends with a commercial SAE 5w30 SJ formulated engine oil showed the zMAX penetrated both types of metal far deeper than engine oil alone. Although it was not possible to precisely quantify the difference in penetration depths between zMAX and the engine oil, the order of magnitude difference was at least 100: 1. This ability to soak (i.e., be absorbed) into metal surfaces is the key to zMAX 's effectiveness.


I have a mjor problem with this statement.

Operational science and scientific proof is ALL about Quantifying data.

IF you cannot quantify the depth of penetration, then HOW can you make a statement that, "the order of magnitude difference was at least 100: 1..."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom