I had no idea buying back your car from an insurance company was a thing until it happened to me several years ago.It's not cheap to section in a quarter. Can you buy it back and just drive it like that?
I had no idea buying back your car from an insurance company was a thing until it happened to me several years ago.It's not cheap to section in a quarter. Can you buy it back and just drive it like that?
I have always heard the threshold was 80%. Now with that number being lower coupled with the price of repairs insurance companies are having to pay nowadays, it is sad that we have to total these older (but still nice and functional) vehicles. I have a 2008 BMW 528i and I dread the day that I have to make a claim on that thing only to hear that it would be a total loss. Man, I love driving that car!
I think a better way to think about it is that you get a smaller total loss check and keep the car vs. the larger payout and the insurance takes the car. Here use that towards getting it fixed if you really like it. Always will be cheaper than a new one. I always figured a cash customer would get a better deal at a body shop for repairs like this...can use used parts etc.I had no idea buying back your car from an insurance company was a thing until it happened to me several years ago.
Current threshold with my insurance is 90%, but due to the high values in the used marketplace they’ll go a little higher.
Just hurts that this is the second used car I’ve bought in really nice shape and less than 2 years into my ownership been hit and totaled.
First one I bought back and drove for four more years.
Allegedly this won’t go against me at all.I feel for ya, but the way the insurance industry is going. I wouldn't involve them in this matter at all. The claim will follow you for some time. Your rates will more than likely go up for filing a claim. If you have the misfortune of having to file another claim w/in a year or two (glass, comp, etc), you will likely get dropped all together. Ask me how I know this.
I was told that by my agent as well. Two deer hits and one glass claim in a 2yr period got me dropped. What I could find is about 2x as expensive. 54yrs old with zero claims or tickets in ~25yrs.Allegedly this won’t go against me at all.
Of course they’ll still respect me in the morning.
Regrettably, even if the insurance company pays nothing out, or denies liability for a claim, the insured is charged for the claim. That is why one has to be careful before contacting the insurance company, just the call is captured in the insurance company's system as a claim.I feel for ya, but the way the insurance industry is going. I wouldn't involve them in this matter at all. The claim will follow you for some time. Your rates will more than likely go up for filing a claim. If you have the misfortune of having to file another claim w/in a year or two (glass, comp, etc), you will likely get dropped all together. Ask me how I know this.
Can you explain your logic for not involving the insurance company? The OP was struck from behind and the other driver admitted responsibility for causing the accident. Why shouldn't he file a claim against the at fault party's insurance if the OP was not at fault?I feel for ya, but the way the insurance industry is going. I wouldn't involve them in this matter at all. The claim will follow you for some time. Your rates will more than likely go up for filing a claim. If you have the misfortune of having to file another claim w/in a year or two (glass, comp, etc), you will likely get dropped all together. Ask me how I know this.
In poking around my insurance cos website, they had a tip to contact the other party’s insurance directly if one is not at fault. This is what you’re saying and agreed. Our total loss was comprehensive and we were told no change to rates.Can you explain your logic for not involving the insurance company? The OP was struck from behind and the other driver admitted responsibility for causing the accident. Why shouldn't he file a claim against the at fault party's insurance if the OP was not at fault?
Can you explain your logic for not involving the insurance company? The OP was struck from behind and the other driver admitted responsibility for causing the accident. Why shouldn't he file a claim against the at fault party's insurance if the OP was not at fault?
Iirc the OP stated the liable party has the same insurance as he has.You're right! I must have gotten lost in the thread. The OP doesn't need to involve his insurance at all then.
Not worth collision insurance, I feel comprehensive is worth it. Comprehensive is cheap, Well of course variables abound depending on state. I was always more concerned about theft or attempted theft or damage to a car other than an accident.That'll buff right out
No really though, glad you're ok and that nobody was hurt.
With cheap cars, it's usually not worth it to keep comprehensive insurance, unless you're financing. The total threshold is usually 70% of the value of the car.