You understand there is no such thing, right? And for good reason.In a free enterprise/capitalist society demand would dictate what the market does, not government.
You understand there is no such thing, right? And for good reason.In a free enterprise/capitalist society demand would dictate what the market does, not government.
I'm not in the market, but I'd buy a PHEV. But not an EV. Too many issues charging, too expensive to have an electrician wire a bigger outlet into our garage, and EV's are too expensive in general.These articles are becoming more prominent, and examined one at a time, may seem incredulous and overly sensitive.
But there's a trend here. There are now many articles reporting the same phenomenon. It's no longer just a few folks in denial of EVs. It's the mainstream balking at the overall idea. Major OEMs can't justify the expenditures of money and resources for such a low ROI. Whereas sales do ebb and flow by region, it's obvious that the upward trend of EV sales nationwide was only due to the boom among believers; those who are are able and willing to buy an EV will do so. But that hasn't convinced the majority of the overall car market; they aren't willing to fall lock-step in line.
IMO, are EVs a bad idea? Not really; they make sense in some applications. But, they are a half-baked idea; they're not fully reasoned and resourced upstream of the end user. The vehicles themselves aren't the problem as much as the over-promised potential (range; performance; repair costs; quality problems; etc), combined with a lack of full service on the national scene regarding charging, infrastructure, etc.
I've noticed a slew of articles, videos, and news releases all saying the same thing; EVs are not ready for prime time and the audience isn't interested in being involved at this point.
We’ve been living under emissions regulations since the 70’s. I’d say the time to fix it has already run out.In a free enterprise/capitalist society demand would dictate what the market does, not government.
My local electric company will rebate me the cost to install the EV charging outlet up to $1500.I'm not in the market, but I'd buy a PHEV. But not an EV. Too many issues charging, too expensive to have an electrician wire a bigger outlet into our garage, and EV's are too expensive in general.
EVs are kinda like a really clever magic trick that has been revealed. Plus all the virtues have been signaled ad nauseum and they have been discovered to be slight of hand tricks too.
Eventually even the rubes catch on.
View attachment 186936
Listverse
Yeah, we have offers here too, not sure if that much or not.My local electric company will rebate me the cost to install the EV charging outlet up to $1500.
Yup, that makes sense but due to factors that I don't understand, electric companies often seem to want to sell you less electricity.Yeah, we have offers here too, not sure if that much or not.
GM will do it for free if you purchase one of their cars.
The electric company wants to sell you electricity instead of you buying gas. Plus they get to write off the $1,500 as a business expense, as does GM I guess.
I think the only ICE I'd consider is an X3 or X4 M or MCOMP. That is roughly in line with the price of my EV, if I were to buy the ///M pre-owned, with similar performance. The fly in the ointment is the operating costs, which are astronomical in comparison.I fixed it for you. My Dr. is not a fan and coincidentally I met someone last night at a seminar that sold his and went back to ICE. I guess it depends.
You're right I'm not a fan, but there was no need to fix it for me, the person I met wasn't a fan either.I think the only ICE I'd consider is an X3 or X4 M or MCOMP. That is roughly in line with the price of my EV, if I were to buy the ///M pre-owned, with similar performance. The fly in the ointment is the operating costs, which are astronomical in comparison.
Electric vehicles were around in the early 1900’s , and seemed to be quite applicable.
Why were they stopped , and then redeveloped 100 years later?
This and battery technology lagged behind. Whether that was lack of advancement based on at the the time current advancements or fuel being cheaper, EV wasn't the chosen option. The main reason batteries have improved is how powerful our mobile devices are these days. That made massive leaps forward."OIL": advances in the chemistry, mining, transport, etc...
There trying to lower peak. The difference in demand between off peak to peak could be double depending on the area. So they either need to build more generation or find a way to lower peak.due to factors that I don't understand, electric companies often seem to want to sell you less electricity.
Yes and no.Yes, and hybrids (particularly PHEV's) achieve the goal of moving the emissions outside of the city centre.
I was just noting that with a PHEV in particular, since you can drive around on 100% battery in-town, any emissions generated are going to be on longer trips outside city centres, where they are more easily dispersed.Yes and no.
Hybrid helps keeping the engine practical size (you can still have a bigger engine running atkinson cycle and make it practially a smaller engine) smaller, and therefore keep it in the optimal efficiency band instead of designing it for the acceleration need and oversize it. Sure CVT does some of that but you still need the power to accelerate and CVT, stop start, etc can't do that without a battery. Then you also add regen braking and that also help a lot in the energy use in local traffic.
This is the reason why hybrid is the best thing for emission and fuel economy money can buy now. It really nets a real emission and fuel consumption reduction instead of just shifting it around.
They did that with like, Chevy Spark, Nissan Leaf, etc. Didn't cost much less than 35k and they didn't get much interest other than from cheap skate who won't spend money.Manufacturers are missing a bulk of the market by not making affordable EV's for the masses. We also have to get a more built out charging network countrywide and more range.
I think I read somewhere that the partial throttle low rpm driving situation is still best suited for port injection. However I've also seen Mazda did their only direct injection Skyactiv engine well and it burns hot enough to avoid intake valve deposit problem and still not have NOX problem. Not sure how they did that but those guys in Mazda are really amazing at what they did without spending R&D for hybrid, CVT, or EV.It reduces valve deposits and supposedly allows more power to be made. That said, I've murdered every 5.0 Mustang that's messed with my Kia, so whatever. I'm sure with enough mods one would be quicker/faster.
Pretty much all Fords use Direct and Port injection or some form of dual injection nowadays.